MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE
Vous souhaitez réagir à ce message ? Créez un compte en quelques clics ou connectez-vous pour continuer.
MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE

Vues Du Monde : ce Forum MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE est lieu d'échange, d'apprentissage et d'ouverture sur le monde.IL EXISTE MILLE MANIÈRES DE MENTIR, MAIS UNE SEULE DE DIRE LA VÉRITÉ.
 
AccueilAccueil  PortailPortail  GalerieGalerie  RechercherRechercher  Dernières imagesDernières images  S'enregistrerS'enregistrer  Connexion  
Derniers sujets
Marque-page social
Marque-page social reddit      

Conservez et partagez l'adresse de MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE sur votre site de social bookmarking
QUOI DE NEUF SUR NOTRE PLANETE
LA FRANCE NON RECONNAISSANTE
Ephémerides
Le Deal du moment : -43%
-100€ Pack rééquipement Philips Hue ...
Voir le deal
129.99 €

 

 5 Thing That Drive me Nuts by Scott Abel

Aller en bas 
AuteurMessage
mihou
Rang: Administrateur
mihou


Nombre de messages : 8092
Localisation : Washington D.C.
Date d'inscription : 28/05/2005

5 Thing That Drive me Nuts by Scott Abel Empty
03102007
Message5 Thing That Drive me Nuts by Scott Abel

5 Thing That Drive me Nuts
by Scott Abel


There are actually hundreds of things that drive Scott Abel nuts, but
for the sake of relative brevity and our own sanity, we'd like to
present just 5 of the things that make Scott chew his liver.
Here they are, in no particular order:

1. Chemical Solutions to Biological Problems This
one is a societal problem in general perpetuated by the powerful drug
company lobbies that control politics and manipulate media.
Specifically. It's a real crucial issue in the bodybuilding industry
that has gone to insane levels. I've had people write me with questions
like, "I started dieting 3 weeks ago, so when should I start using
thyroid?" Say what? And the way such questions are written so
matter-of-factly illustrates an ongoing problem with bodybuilding and
bodybuilders. The fact is the body prefers biology over chemistry in
working out its own issues. Of course I'm not talking about a medical
need for intervention. I'm talking about an "attitude" toward blatant
chemical abuse in the name of what used to be a culture of health and
wellness. What I've witnessed in the last 5 years is frightening to me.
Testosterone dosages have increased to multiple grams per week
and this has led directly to the use of many medications totally
unrelated to performance enhancement. Escalating Testosterone use has
led to a real need for anti-depressants, anti-anxiety drugs,
anti-inflammatory drugs, cholesterol lowering medication, blood
pressure lowering medication, muscle relaxants, and sleep medication.
Many are using these meds on top of their ridiculous stacks. The expense to human physiology is huge. This
idiocy may make you sound intelligent in certain circles, but really it
just means being part of a drug subculture similar to the
heroin/crystal meth subculture. Right now certain web sites and experts
would have you believe you need to combat every effect of one drug with
another. Now they use Benadryl to open receptors from clen
use that has desensitized Beta 2 receptors. They use another drug to
combat the increase in prolactin levels from Deca. And on it goes. It's
ridiculous. You aren't chemists and you aren't pharmacists, and you
certainly aren't doctors. An amateur training for the World
Drug Tested Championships wanted to hire me as a coach. He sent me a
list of his stack — it included 16 different drugs. I turned him down. Champions
aren't forged from a syringe! You may win a show, but so what? Of
course I know I'm only speaking to people here who want to listen, but
this mentality is not only dangerous but fruitless long term. A
few weeks ago Testosterone featured a photo of the original giant
killer, Danny Padilla. Most who saw that pic saw him as a complete
physique, hard as nails and in better shape than most of the
polypharmacy drug users representing the masses out there in the modern
era. Danny was from a bygone era. In those early days, an
off-season stack consisted of Deca and D-bol, while an on season stack
consisted of Deca and Anavar. That was it. 5 Thing That Drive me Nuts by Scott Abel Image003
Danny Padilla, just a little Deca and a little D-bol.

2. Training Heavy! I
will say again, and you will see me say this repeatedly in articles,
"Heavy is not how much is on the bar; Heavy is how much stress a muscle
is under." The former is an external queue that has no
meaning in and of itself. The latter is an internal performance
indicator that bears fruit short and long term. As experts and trainees
we need to stop being so one dimensional in our thinking. The
second problem with this assumption is that somehow people then equate
load with intensity. In other words, I get letters where people
"assume" they're training hardbecause they're training with heavy loads. Wrong,
wrong, wrong. And there's also an expert bias that "strength training"
is CNS training; hypertrophy training is myofibril training; and
conditioning training is metabolic. These are only categories
of reference and they're not mutually exclusive. There exists this bias
that high volume training is somehow lower intensity. Untrue. Workload
capacity can be improved to a point where tremendous volumes can be
handled at high intensities. Once again, these need not be mutually
exclusive, and to think that way is to misrepresent research and
decades of real life, in-the-trenches experience. Case in point: Eric Heiden. I
always use this example when doing seminars for people interested in
Hypertrophy Training. Eric Heiden was a very special athlete. He won
multiple gold medals for the US in speed skating. He also accomplished
what most exercise physiologists would say is impossible. He won Gold
in all the sprint events and the endurance events as well; kind of like
winning a marathon and the 100-meter sprint in the same Olympics. What
he accomplished was truly spectacular. Eric's physique was also well
known. At about 185 lbs he had 28-inch thighs at a time when no one
even in bodybuilding could come close. The sweep on his thighs was just
incredible and something any bodybuilder would kill to have. Because
Eric was training for speed, power, and endurance, he developed
a very unique training style that's been ignored to this day, I think
merely because it's so hard, and goes against the grain of thought,
that heavy is a matter of load only. 5 Thing That Drive me Nuts by Scott Abel Image004
Twenty-eight inch thighs. Eric
was known for what I call ultra heavy training. Remember that I said
earlier that heavy is not how much load is on the bar, but rather how
much stress the muscle is under. Eric was known to do leg presses with
500lbs. No big deal. However, Eric did sets of 100s reps with 500lbs! Now
that's heavy, if you understand load, overload, and time under tension
in an explosive sense, and not with this crazy tempo interpretation of
such. Eric was also known to squat 205 pounds, butt to
heels...for 300 reps. His leg size, shape, density, and sweep were what
every bodybuilder dreams of. Yet no one trains like this because they
equate "heavy" with load, rather than stress. The only guy
that came close to adapting that kind of training for legs was Tom
Platz, and I guess he didn't train heavy either, since he didn't do low
rep percent max's near his absolute strength base. I trained
at home all summer and I did sets of squats with only a "Bodyblade"
behind my neck for 5 sets of 100 reps, and then single leg BW lunges
for 4 sets of 50 reps. That was the beginning of my leg workout every other workout — no weights, and my legs have never been better.

3. Eat Less on Off Days
I'm
not sure where this one comes from, but it reflects a bias toward
seeing our body as being on the same man made 24-hour clock that guides
us from one day to the next. Quite simply our bodies do not work this
way, on this time schedule.
This
assumption draws two conclusions that are faulty at best. One is that
you can somehow get fat in a day. Not true. Once we've re-programmed
the body to be a fat burning machine, then you won't get fat in a day.
The
other assumption is a negation of the hypertrophy process. This process
is complex and metabolically expensive. Satellite cells will only fuse
with the myocyte to create a bigger cell when very specific conditions
are met. These involve a supercompensation effect. Cells must have full
storage of nutrients and energy. 5 Thing That Drive me Nuts by Scott Abel Image005
Smooth muscle cells.
Only
at this point will the body build up actin/myosin components triggered
from a training effect. This takes time and an understanding of
creating supercompensation to energy stores within the cell. Once this
happens and cells are properly hydrated, only then will there by a
signal for higher concentrations of IGF 1 and 2, which will then,
combined with other growth factors, create a bigger cell.
What
all this means is that concentrating on always 'burning off' nutrients,
neglects proper storage essential to real growth. Most dieting
bodybuilders will tell you they're always hungriest on off days of
training. This is essential biofeedback.
Hunger
means two things — fat is being burned (hence the hunger signal), and
the body is in "need" of something. This is a very simplistic
extrapolation, but true none the less. On the Cycle Diet, my clients
and athletes are instructed to take their cheat days, or spike meals on
off days from training, and the reason is simple. It's so they can eat
MORE, and store MORE.
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
https://vuesdumonde.forumactif.com/
Partager cet article sur : reddit

5 Thing That Drive me Nuts by Scott Abel :: Commentaires

mihou
Re: 5 Thing That Drive me Nuts by Scott Abel
Message Mer 3 Oct - 23:36 par mihou
Remember, once a
fat burning metabolism has been established, then energy goes to where
it's needed most. With proper training stimulus, this means nutrient
supercompensation within the cells, which is exactly what the aim
should be. Eating less on off days misses this entirely because once
again the focus is too micro analytical.
Take a look at Andy Sinclair and firefighter Kevin Porter, both clients of mine: 5 Thing That Drive me Nuts by Scott Abel Image007
Andy Sinclair 5 Thing That Drive me Nuts by Scott Abel Image009
Kevin Porter
Both
are on versions of my Cycle Diet. Andy was with me for less than a year
when he scored two magazine covers. He loves the Cycle Diet because
when he gets an opportunity for a photo shoot, he cuts out a cheat day
or two and boom, he's as ripped as you see in this picture.
Then
he's right back to the Cycle Diet with full-on cheat days and
calorie-spike day as well. He makes constant improvements and always
has ample energy.
The point is, he takes his cheat day on off days from training with the sole goal to eat as much as he can, not less.
To learn more about the Cycle Diet, check out my DVD, The Science Behind the Cycle Diet.

4, Bodybuilder's Aren't Strong
I'll
admit it. I've seen my share of well known professional bodybuilders
whose workout performance was less than impressive. Lately, though,
there's been a mass attack on bodybuilding for all kinds of reasons
unrelated to the obvious ones. (And I totally support most of those
criticisms.)
I've criticized the
consequences of conventional bodybuilding training over time and what
it takes away from the body in terms of function, along with the loss
of key components of athleticism and resulting neural confusion.
However
this is a consequence of a type of training. There are consequences to
most types of training. Runners for instance are the most injured
people in the athletic arena and usually suffer prolonged downgrade of
the sex hormones.
Plyometric training
and getting carried away with plyometric training has led to more than
one career-ending injury. Power lifters have numerous muscle imbalances
and joint problems. And the list goes on.
But
then other experts seem to attack bodybuilders for no other reason than
some Napoleon complex. I've read more than one expert refer to
bodybuilders as weak and how that said expert could out perform
bodybuilders on strange and selective max lifts.
This
whole thing strikes me as kind of strange. You may out lift said
bodybuilder, but if it's me or one of my clients, you'll never OUT
TRAIN us!
There's a difference between
criticizing consequence and criticizing methodology. If you can't see
the difference, then shame on you.
Most
experts make great valid points about the limitations of body part
training. However, you either believe in the SAID principle
(specificity) or you don't. To criticize a bodybuilder for not having
absolute strength in strange exercises makes no sense.
Hypertrophy
training requires attention to higher rep ranges at specific joint
angles and in limited planes and ranges of motion. Why not attack Tom
Platz or Ronnie Coleman then, for not being as strong as power lifters
of equal bodyweight, and therefore call them "weak." 5 Thing That Drive me Nuts by Scott Abel Image010
Ronnie Coleman
While
we are at it, why not criticize marathon runners for not having bigger
legs, because after all they use them daily. Specificity is not a viable vantage point of selective bias.
There are plenty of reasons to criticize bodybuilding training and the
bodybuilding subculture, but claiming them to be weak, and using
absolute strength as proof, is just more "expert bias" played out to
the unaware consumer.
Using myself as
an example in my latest MET training DVD, you can witness me doing
300lb seated rows and 150-pound one arm DB rows (not that weight
matters), and these lifts are part of complexes.
Not
bad strength for an old retired guy who's been clean for years. I just
find that statement or conclusion that bodybuilders are weak to be a
misrepresentation based on expert bias.

5. Don't Eat Carbs Before Bed
Once
again, this is a misinterpretation of studying improper dieting
practices of regular people and then applying it to athletes and active
people. The original premise was based on the fact that many North
Americans skip breakfast, eat a sparse lunch, and then get home and eat
ravenously till bedtime.
Athletes do
not eat this way. Also, there was some research that suggests that the
overnight GH output was thwarted by carb intake before bed. 5 Thing That Drive me Nuts by Scott Abel Image012
Much
is missed with such assumptions. For one thing, once again there is no
predisposition to store fat from any energy source in a
calorie-controlled situation. Once fat burning metabolism has been
established and calories are balanced throughout the day, then carbs
before bed or at night can be a good thing.
I've
followed this eating pattern for 20 years now. Ask any pre-contest
athletes what one of the worst parts of prep is and they'll surely tell
you it's the insomnia related to a low-calorie biological needs state.
Understanding neurotransmitters goes a long way to a remedy for this
situation. Many low carb dieters get weak willed and binge eat at night
simply because of a lack of understanding of the above information and
body processes. Or they could just be getting bad diet strategy advice.

The neurotransmitters in the brain
central to this concern are from the catecholamine family such as
dopamine, and more importantly serotonin. Serotonin in particular plays
a crucial role in eating, sleeping and abiding natural circadian
rhythms.
Having some carbohydrates at
the last meal of the day will go a long way to regulating serotonin
output to induce sleep, especially in a fatigued state.

Metabolic Drive, Complete: A perfect last meal of the day.
Once again, in a calorie-controlled situation — once fat burning metabolism has been established — there is no predisposition for your body to store fat from any energy source regardless of timing.
If
you consider only the training affect and nutrient intake effect of
diet on training, you fail to see all the other hormonal and
biochemical interactions that various foodstuffs and macro nutrients
influence.
GH, for instance, is also
thwarted by insomnia or restless sleep. So this becomes a Catch 22
situation. For me as a coach, sleep does far too many good and
essential things for recovery to be neglected by an oversight in faulty
logic or dogmatic approaches to diet. If you want to be able to stick
to a calorie deficit diet and get ample rest and recovery, then make
sure there are some carbohydrates in your last meal of the day.


In the brief time before receiving this article and getting ready to
post it, Scott's already submitted another 142 things that drive him
nuts. We'll have to see if we post any or all of them. In the meantime,
we hope putting them down on paper serves as some sort of therapy for
him.



http://www.t-nation.com/readTopic.do?id=1748139
 

5 Thing That Drive me Nuts by Scott Abel

Revenir en haut 

Page 1 sur 1

 Sujets similaires

-
» Best of the Best of the Back by Scott Abel
» Death to Crunching by Scott Abel
» Total-Body Arm Training by Scott Abel
» Periodization Nuts and Bolts
» Coretta Scott King

Permission de ce forum:Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE :: SANTE-SPORTS/HEALTH :: EXERCICES ET CONDITIONNEMENT PHYSIQUES/EXERCISES AND CONDITIONING-
Sauter vers: