MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE
Vous souhaitez réagir à ce message ? Créez un compte en quelques clics ou connectez-vous pour continuer.
MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE

Vues Du Monde : ce Forum MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE est lieu d'échange, d'apprentissage et d'ouverture sur le monde.IL EXISTE MILLE MANIÈRES DE MENTIR, MAIS UNE SEULE DE DIRE LA VÉRITÉ.
 
AccueilAccueil  PortailPortail  GalerieGalerie  RechercherRechercher  Dernières imagesDernières images  S'enregistrerS'enregistrer  Connexion  
Derniers sujets
Marque-page social
Marque-page social reddit      

Conservez et partagez l'adresse de MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE sur votre site de social bookmarking
QUOI DE NEUF SUR NOTRE PLANETE
LA FRANCE NON RECONNAISSANTE
Ephémerides
Le Deal du moment : -30%
LEGO Icons 10318 – Le Concorde à ...
Voir le deal
139.99 €

 

 Best of the Best of the Back by Scott Abel

Aller en bas 
AuteurMessage
mihou
Rang: Administrateur
mihou


Nombre de messages : 8092
Localisation : Washington D.C.
Date d'inscription : 28/05/2005

Best of the Best of the Back by Scott Abel Empty
07092007
MessageBest of the Best of the Back by Scott Abel

Best of the Best of the Back



It was one of the best compliments I've ever received. The
year was 1989, and I was the only Canadian selected to work at the L.A.
Musclecamp, which was a huge deal back then. The experience changed
several lives in this industry, and launched a dozen careers, mine
included. Once I settled in to life in Southern California, I
started training regularly at Gold's Gym, but I didn't like it there.
Even though I trained at 5:30 AM, I found the atmosphere too much like
a party, and not conducive to my level of intensity and focus. I
decided to try World Gym, just down the street. I'd heard the stories,
but I wanted a change. I loved World Gym! No music, no chrome,
just the weights and the people coming and going, training hard, and of
course Arnold's private parking spot! Best of the Best of the Back by Scott Abel Image001
Eddie Guiliani, Joe Gold and assorted World Gym denizens, from a bygone era. The
first day I was there, I was greeted by the well-known and
always-smiling Ed Guiliani. He was very nice to me, and we were just in
the middle of a conversation, when Joe Gold came up to us, looked me
right in the eye and said, "You come to my gym, you drop my weights,
you leave, got it?" That was all he had to say that day. I saw
Joe again about a week later. He walked up to me and greeted me, his
attitude completely different from that first day. "You're that
Canadian guy from a couple days ago," he said. I started to respond but
he cut me off. "You know, kid, the best of the best train at my gym, and I gotta say that you've got about the best back that I've seen in here, in a long time. Keep it up." I think I just stood there with my jaw hanging down, saying "Wow, an actual compliment
from Joe Gold." That scene has stayed with me, vivid as ever, for
nearly twenty years. I'd found my home, and Eddie sealed the deal by
supplying me with the obligatory World Gym tanks and other attire. Fast
forward to now. A new era of training is upon us, yet in many ways
nothing has changed. I realized a long time ago that Innervation
Training went against the status quo, but the results have been
undeniable for nearly three decades. Our most recent success is two
class wins up here last weekend at the Canadian Nationals, and a pro
card for young Lou Joseph. Best of the Best of the Back by Scott Abel Image004
Scott Abel's latest success story: Lou Joseph, new IFBB pro Innervation
Training is a viable bodybuilding methodology in an era where exercises
are mistaken for programs, and programs are mistaken for a methodology.
Both of these are based on faulty logic. A Chinese proverb
says, "To know the best way up the mountain, ask the man who travels it
every day." In terms of back training, I've been going up the mountain
most of my life, so in this article I'll show you the best way up, and
touch on some of the principles of Innervation Training along the way. Best of the Best of the Back by Scott Abel Image006
The mountain

Muscular Skeletal Bias Researchers
in the strength game who fail to acknowledge the neurological component
to training adaptation can often miss important variables, or use them
within a context that's illogical in the grand scheme. One example is "exercise bias." There's currently a bias toward specific movements as the
key exercises for development. The best thing that can be said of this
bias is that it doesn't work on an individual basis. The worst thing
that can be said is that it misses the point entirely. A
young lad recently wrote to me that he couldn't do a single chin-up.
When I asked why he wanted a program to make him better at chins, he
said that he wanted to build his back. I told him that in his case, his
back development did not depend on his ability to do chins. My advice
was to stop wasting valuable gym time in a futile attempt to master a
single movement, and move on to a more appropriate and viable program.
Unless
you're being tested on how many chins you can do, there's no reason to
consider it a priority in your development. Your precious gym time is
better served doing other movements to which your physique will be more
responsive. Responsiveness is a neurological biofeedback mechanism of
great importance to the training protocol.

Some Principles to Innervation Training
Neural Adaptations The following are well-recognized mechanisms of neural adaptations to training:
1.
Increased agonist activation. This means becoming more efficient at
recruiting the largest motor unit thresholds and increasing firing
rates, within targeted agonists.
2. Selective
recruitment of motor units within agonists. Specifically, rotation of
motor units and PMS (pre-movement silence) are important neural
adaptations in advanced trainees, indicative of this adaptive response.
3.
Selective activation of agonists within a muscle group. Staying with
the right exercises produces a neural response that I call "performance
mastery," which is a good thing. This shouldn't be confused with
habituation, which occurs when the same exercise is done in the same
way, for the same reps, in the same sequence, all the time. This would
be a bad thing. These are quite general. There are other
factors, such as increased firing frequency, motor unit
synchronization, altering recruitment, reflex potentiation, cross
education, and co-contraction of antagonists, which are more applicable
to sports performance than to target training for bodybuilding
purposes. The picture gets cloudier when we consider many
other studies yielding results that go against the grain of modern
training approaches. Here are a few key points:

Excitation Thresholds The
biggest factor missed by most experts is the area of excitation
thresholds of motor units and recruitment patterns. The fact is that
motor units with lower excitation thresholds will be preferentially
activated in a given movement, regardless of the intended targeted
muscles. This goes beyond what most experts address in explaining weak
muscles, unresponsive muscles, and the importance of exercises
selection. Most people with a bodypart that's unresponsive to
training usually have a highly responsive bodypart right next to it.
Even though the trainee is targeting one area, the more neurologically
dominant and responsive muscle takes on most of the work. The more
responsive muscles have lower excitation thresholds, and will therefore
act first. This is one reason you should exhaust your best body parts
early in training so they'll be less likely to "take over" the work
later on. According to Paton and Brown, the nervous system
has a marked ability to selectively activate segments of a muscle
preferentially over the targeted intention. Their research clearly
showed that angle of contraction, and joint angle, is more important
than intensity to recruiting the segments of a muscle belly targeted in
activity:
"... in the same study of latissimus
segmented contribution to contraction at both 0 degrees, and 90 degrees
abducted position of the shoulder, an increase in the level of
contraction from 20% MVC to 70% MVC decreased the contribution of
segment 1 latissimus and increased contribution of [the belly of the
muscle]." (1995:306)
Different recruitment
patterns are related more to central command (CNS) than sensory
feedback (afferent neuronal system). "The recruitment thresholds of
motor units of a muscle active in a movement may also be affected by
changes in joint angle." (Tax et al 1989, Van Zulen et al 1988, Paton
and Brown 1995, Romeny et al 1982, 1984) What all of this
suggests is that angle of contraction and exercise order are far more
important than rep ranges and load variance.

Back Training The
first mistake most trainees make and coaches ignore is that the
latissimus, like any other muscle group, receives the most overload
when the fibers are stretched with resistance. The reason so
many people lack back development is that they don't know how to put
this in to action. Whatever back movement you are doing, you must move
counter to the movement of the weight. This means that leaning into
back movements is a good thing, and leaning away is a bad thing.

Proper Rowing Technique As
important as all the variations of the row are to back development,
it's sad that most trainees don't have a clue how to row properly. Even
seemingly small mistakes invite other muscles to take over, negating
the row's benefit for your back. Consider, for example, the
"Yates row," a 45-degree bent row popularized in the 1990s by Dorian
Yates. Of course Dorian was a great champion, but this exercise was a
mistake. Remember that range and plane of motion is everything.
In that 45-degree angle, there's far too much trunk support to
contraction base. So while you can row more weight this way (and be
that much more impressed with yourself), your lats will not receive
optimal overload. Best of the Best of the Back by Scott Abel Image008
Yates: great big back


Dernière édition par le Ven 7 Sep - 22:29, édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
https://vuesdumonde.forumactif.com/
Partager cet article sur : reddit

Best of the Best of the Back by Scott Abel :: Commentaires

mihou
The
Yates row is the upper body equivalent of the half-squat or 1/3 bench.
Sure, you might be able to move more weight that way, but hey, are we
trying to build muscle here, or ego? Best of the Best of the Back by Scott Abel Image010
Yates row: great big mistake Proper
bent row technique means being bent in a parallel position to the
floor, knees slightly bent to remove low back strain, and an elevated
position standing on a block, box, or platform. This reduces trunk
support and puts the body in a more favorable plane of motion
to overload the muscles of the back. The reason you row off a block or
a platform is that the bar should actually touch the toes at the bottom
of the movement. This is what stretching the fibers with resistance is
all about. So stand on a block, and get that weight down to the bar touching the toes. You'll also need to shift weightto
over the chest instead of back on your haunches. Again, the solution is
to create less base support, or what I refer to as joint stress transfer, which I'll cover in a future article. The
following point is so important, you should print it out, underline it
with a red marker, and pin it to your gym shorts: keep your elbows
slightly bent at all times. If you unlock the arms at the
elbow, then your initial pull on the weights will be with the
brachioradialis and biceps muscles, negating the all-important
pre-stretch of the targeted latissimus.
Using a reverse
grip for rows just exacerbates this problem, and indeed, this is
exactly how Dorian tore his biceps. The plane and range of motion of
the 45-degree row, combined with unlocking the elbows with a reverse
grip, was too much for the biceps in that plane and range of motion
with that load. We see this in the seated row as well. First off, the starting position of your torso should not
be perpendicular to the ground. You need a much more exaggerated
forward lean than that. If the foot plates of your seated row machine
don't allow for leaning, then throw a box or a set of DB's in front of
the foot plates to insure, more effective pre-stretch. (Watch my 5 Day
MET Training DVD for an example). You must lean intothis
movement. Remember, if you unlock the arms at the elbows, then the
initial pull of the row will be centered in the arms, negating your
targeted back work.
Best of the Best of the Back by Scott Abel Image014
Scott Abel's MET Training DVD set, available at his website I
can hear the "experts" howling that leaning forward will risk damaging
your lumbar vertebrae. To them I say, phooey. If you want results, then
you must push the envelope of performance. I'm not recommending that
you throw caution to the wind, but rather to engage yourself in proper
lifting mechanics. Leaning into a lift is no more dangerous than
deadlifting or squatting butt to heels. So for all rows, lean
into the movement, and keep a slight bend in the elbows and lock that
position. You wouldn't hyperextend your knees when doing stiff-legged
deadlifts, right? So don't hyperextend your elbows in the row. Remember
my maxim: "Rowit, don't throwit!" Finally, if
you're biceps dominant, then chins more than likely are not for you.
Once again, Innervation Training research means looking at "movements"
and exercises differently. If you have very responsive low excitation
thresholds in your biceps, then more than likely they will absorb or
share too much of the load for you when doing chins. Once again, there
are no special exercises (other than compounds); there are just
exercises that work best for you. Technique and sequence become
everything.

Cadence For me
"tempo training" is a result of misinterpreted research, but that's for
another article. Duration of overload implies that very low reps are
useless for hypertrophy goals. (Behm 1995) Tempo training also negates
individual "overload" and is faulty logic at best for hypertrophy
concerns. I'm only concerned with two cadences: the explosive or power cadence, and the pumping or bodybuilding cadence. Being explosive is all about how fast you are trying to move the bar,
not how fast the bar actually moves. (See Behm 1995, and many others)
Obviously the greater the load the slower it will move, but your intent
should always be to move it as fast as possible. This means paying
close attention to performance to insure not to use momentum, torque,
or leverage to help lift the weight. Doing this will only bypass the
crucial range of motion where overload is maximal. This is also another
reason why no one, not your spotter, not your girlfriend, not even God, should be touching the bar while you're lifting it. A
bodybuilding cadence is just pumping reps without stopping at the
bottom or top of a movement. The movement should be purposeful
throughout the entire range of motion, and your intention should be full contraction of the muscles, not just completing the rep. The bodybuilding cadence is all about squeezing
for every inch or every rep of every set, top to bottom with no pausing
between reps. You can vary speed here as in going slower but it does
not need to be gauged by a clock. This is all part of keeping the
program alive, which we'll discuss in a bit. The way my
programs work is that the first two exercises (depending on level of
development and intra workout biofeedback from exercise one) in a
traditional program are done explosively using a weight to reach
failure within the rep range indicated. From there, as you progress
down the workout, you approach exercises with a bodybuilding cadence,
which you can manipulate from workout to workout as part of keeping the
program alive. The first exercise on my programs are not
determined by isolation vs. compound movements, which is limited
thinking. Remember that Innervation training is all about joint angle,
anatomical leverage, and speed considerations. So if a pulldown is the
first movement of a workout, it will be done explosively. If it is
last, or in the middle of the sequence, then it will be done with a
constant tension cadence. This approach is simple and effective. It
takes the thinking out and puts the concentration in!

Rest Intervals All
training for hypertrophy should involve some degree of oxygen debt.
This is something misunderstood by most trainees who do a set, and then
walk around and chat on their damned cell phones. It amazes me to see
people without a drop of sweat on them at the end of a workout,
thinking they're somehow building muscle. Rest intervals are dictated by biofeedback, and two things need to be self-assessed. The first is oxygen debt recovery.
When your breathing returns to "almost normal," then you're ready for
your next set. The other factor is your psychological assessment of
performance readiness. What this means is, if you can look at the bar,
see the weight and feel you can perform the movement at least
that well again, then do your next set, even before your breathing is
totally back to resting level.
After that set, this is
when load becomes informational. If you weren't able to do the same
weight for the same reps, then you didn't rest long enough. This is how
to gauge proper rest intervals using rep ranges as performance
guidelines. Best of the Best of the Back by Scott Abel Image016
Lou Joseph assesses his performance readiness. You
can also keep the program alive by focusing on fewer rest intervals and
proceeding to your next set further and further into oxygen debt.
Mixing this up from workout to workout keeps the body guessing, but
also keeps you honest about your own performance levels by gauging
biofeedback, and not meaningless cues like your wrist watch or how much
weight you lifted. Self-assessment is a key tool in the Innervation
Training protocol.

Sample Workouts Using
traditional back training as an example, I'll give you a sample workout
from one of the 700 or so template programs I've designed. Keep in mind
this is not etched in stone. While this workout is geared more toward
someone who'd benefit mostly from rowing, another program may be
oriented toward various upright positions, pulldowns, chin variations,
etc. It's important to not think one dimensionally. Remember, a workout
does not constitute an entire program, nor does a collection of workouts. What
you do today for back should be based on what you did last time for
back. It should also be based on your current needs state, on what you
may have done yesterday in and out of the gym, and on what you'll do
tomorrow. This is where the art of program design makes the difference.
The magic is not in fancy exercises with fancy names, and
crazy tempos. It's all about the individual, and exercise sequencing,
and proper rep ranges, which get bastardized all the time by so-called
strength researchers.
mihou
Below
is a sample of one of my 5-day programs, which I designed for a
bodybuilding client with unique individual leverage advantages and
disadvantages. Long arms mean one is better at deadlifts, and worse at
chins. Or at best, chins are less efficient for back development.
Chins, therefore, are eliminated from this program. This doesn't apply
to everyone, of course. Once again, there are hundreds of variables and
options, and it really takes experience and a good deal of knowledge to
apply proper programming. Best of the Best of the Back by Scott Abel Image018
Traditional Hypertrophy Program Sets Reps Workout 1: 1. Partial deadlifts, top 1/3 warm ups, then 5 3 2. Reverse grip pulldowns 1 warm up, then 1 6-8; 8-10; 12-15 3. One-arm dumbbell rows 4 12-15 (each side) 4. Supported seated rows 4 10-12 5. Pulldowns to front 4 10-12 Workout 2: 1. Bent over rows warm ups (3-4 sets), then 4 8-12 2. Close grip pulldowns 4 12-15 3. One-arm hammer rows 4 12-15 (each side) 4. Partial deadlifts (top 1/3) 4 8-10 5. Reverse grip pulldowns 4 15 Workout 3: 1. Partial deadlifts warm ups (3-4 sets), then 5 8 (constant weight) 2. Supported bent rows 5 12-15 3. One-arm hammer rows 4 12-15 (each side) 4. Reverse grip pulldowns 3 12-15 5. Seated cable rows 3 10-12 6. Straight arm pulldowns 3 15-20 (slow execution) Workout 4: 1. Bent rows warm ups (3-4 sets) then 4 8-10 2. Reverse grip pulldowns 3 8-10 1 10-12 3. One-arm dumbbell rows 4 10-12 (each side) 4. Seated cable rows 4 10-12 5. Partial deadlifts (top 1/3) 4 12-15 This
is a five-day program, so this represents approximately one month's
worth of workouts. As you see in this particular case, most of the
exercises stay the same, but the sequence and rep schemes change
constantly. Remember that with Innervation Training this will also
determine rep cadence, which once again changes the training effect. Changing
sequence also means adhering to the importance of changing joint angles
for better training effect. Doing one movement before another one week,
then varying its sequence, cadence, and rep range the next week is the
most efficient way to train for hypertrophy. If I had a trainee
with similar leverage structure, for example, but less development and
muscular maturity, then I would modify every other back workout to look
like this: 1A. Dumbbell cleans Warm ups (3-4 sets) then 5 10-12 1B. Straight-arm pulldowns 5 10-15 2A. Two-arm dumbbell snatch, stick lockout 4 10-12 2B. Straight-arm pulldowns 4 15-20 3A. Bent over rows 4 10-12 3B. Straight-arm pulldowns 4 10-12 4A. Deadlifts from floor 4 10-12 4B. Straight arm pulldowns 4 15-20 (slow execution)
*cleans and snatches are done from the hang position This
alternating workout creates huge neural demand, and followed by
straight arm pulldowns it concentrates recruitment in the fibers of the
lats. The straight-arm pulldown shows that form follows function. It is
a great movement to use in such supersets, because it demands low
loads, and has specific recruitment with little systemic exhaustion. So
there are plenty of ways to modify any program based on the needs of
any trainee, advanced or not. Which brings us to our next topic:

Keeping it Alive I
prefer biofeedback over periodization. Biofeedback training is a good
way to keep a program alive by modifying it in three ways: First, the
exercise sequence and rep sequences change. Next, rest periods can be
altered, within reason, to change adaptive stimulus. Finally, within
the actual program there's always room to maneuver and change things
up. Remember that subtle changes are always better than grand ones,
once you have a productive program suited to your own specific needs. For
example, in the workouts above you see ranges of 12 to 15 reps, which
gives you plenty of options. You may want to train at the high end of
that rep range for all sets. You may want to try to pyramid within that
rep range for all sets. You may want to train at the low end of the rep
range for all sets. Or you may want to stagger back and forth one set
at 12, the next at 15, and then back to 12. You may want to go to
failure or use a recovery day within the rep schemes indicated. Combined
with the above options and cadence changes, this allows a trainee to
always keep a program alive and thereby avoid habituation. I have used
"keeping it alive" to stay on one program for as long as 30 weeks, and
still self-assess consistent progress. We need to kill the
notion that for a program to be brilliant, it must be complicated.
There must be room to make a program your own at any time, during any
phase of the training cycle. My coaching clients know this well, as
their biofeedback reports always reflect which way they kept their
programs alive, during the week or weeks of application. So
you can see that Innervation Training is a departure from the standard
protocol. I've been employing this methodology for almost 20 years now,
which is a long time to be going against the grain. I would like to
expand on these concepts and principles in future articles. Give this
back approach a try for one month as written. You'll feel the
difference. Best of the Best of the Back by Scott Abel Image020
Scott
Abel is a professional strength, conditioning, and diet expert,
specializing in Internet coaching and training. See his website for more information.



http://www.t-nation.com/readArticle.do?id=1710469
 

Best of the Best of the Back by Scott Abel

Revenir en haut 

Page 1 sur 1

 Sujets similaires

-
» Death to Crunching by Scott Abel
» 5 Thing That Drive me Nuts by Scott Abel
» Total-Body Arm Training by Scott Abel
» The Top Seven Upper Back Exercises
» How to Get a Thick Back

Permission de ce forum:Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE :: SANTE-SPORTS/HEALTH :: EXERCICES ET CONDITIONNEMENT PHYSIQUES/EXERCISES AND CONDITIONING-
Sauter vers: