PEERS: 100 Professors Question The 9/11 Commission Report

This
message
is available online at http://www.WantToKnow.info/070618professorsquestion911

100 Professors Question

The 9/11 Commission Report

Many
respected and distinguished university professors have expressed
significant criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report. A number even allege
government complicity in the terrorist acts of 9/11. Below are the highly
revealing public statements on this vital topic of over 100 university
professors with links for verification and further investigation.

The collective voices of these respected professors along with over
50 senior government officials and over 100 media
professionals and stars give credibility to the claim that the 9/11
Commission Report is tragically flawed. These dedicated individuals from
across the political spectrum cannot be simply dismissed as irresponsible
believers in some 9/11 conspiracy theory. Their sincere concern, backed
by
impeccable credentials, demonstrates that criticism of the 9/11
Commission
Report is not only reasonable and responsible, it is in fact a patriotic
duty.

[url=][/url]

100 ESTEEMED PROFESSORS ON 9/11

PEERS: 100 Professors Question The 9/11 Commission Report David%20Ray%20Griffin

David Ray Griffin, PhD

[url=][/url]

David Ray Griffin, PhD – Professor Emeritus of
Philosophy
of Religion and Theology, Claremont School of Theology. Author and/or
editor of over two
dozen books, Prof. Griffin first began to question the 9/11 official
story in 2003 while exploring a 9/11 timeline
filled with reliable, verifiable facts suggesting a major cover-up. He
then switched his focus from theology to 9/11 research. His
seminal book on unresolved inconsistencies in the 9/11 official story, The
New Pearl Harbor, has sold over 100,000 copies. His
recent Debunking
9/11 Debunking gives in-depth analysis showing that most critics
of the 9/11 truth movement are avoiding the deep questions on key, easily
verifiable facts.

Essay: "The 9/11 Commission
Report
tells many lies about particular issues. This point is implied by my
critique's subtitle, 'Omissions
and Distortions.' How many lies are contained in The 9/11
Commission Report? I do not know. But, deciding to see how many
lies I had discussed in my book, I found that I had identified over 100
of them. Once I had made the list, it occurred to me that others might
find this summary helpful. Hence this article."[List of 115 lies
follows.] See full essay at http://www.serendipity.li/...

Video of Speech 9/14/06: "The official story
is
false. Now why is the official theory an outrageous conspiracy theory?
Because every one of the major elements in it can easily be shown to be
false."

View video free at http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=62...
Member: Prof. Griffin is an esteemed member of
two major organizations of scholars
dedicated to researching and revealing the truth of what happened on the
fateful day of 9/11, and of the intrepid WantToKnow.info team of
dedicated researchers.
Bio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Ray_Griffin
CV: http://www.ctr4process.org/about/CoDirectors/drg_cv.pdf

PEERS: 100 Professors Question The 9/11 Commission Report A%20K%20Dewdney%20230%20JPG80

A. K. Dewdney, PhD

[url=][/url]

A. K. Dewdney, PhD – Professor Emeritus, Department of
Computer Science, University of Western Ontario. Author of
Scientific
American's "Computer Recreations" and "Mathematical
Recreations" section, 1984 - 1993. Author of over 80 scientific
papers on mathematics, computer science, engineering, astronomy and
biology. Author of numerous books, including: Beyond
Reason: Eight Great Problems That Reveal the Limits of Science
(2004), A
Mathematical Mystery Tour: Discovering the Truth and Beauty of the
Cosmos (2001), Yes,
We Have No Neutrons: (1997), 200%
of Nothing: An Eye Opening Tour Through the Twists and Turns of Math
Abuse
and Innumeracy (1996), The
New Turing Omnibus: Sixty-Six Excursions in Computer Science
(1993).

Essay : "The debris found outside the
Pentagon is inconsistent with the impact of a Boeing 757 or any aircraft
of comparable dimensions. In particular, in the absence of some agency
(possibly unknown to physical science) that removed the wings, there is
no
way to avoid the conclusion that the wings (and therefore the aircraft)
were never present in the first place. In this case, no Boeing 757 struck
the Pentagon building on the morning of September 11, 2001." http://www.physics911.net/mi...
Member: Scientific Panel Investigating
9/11.
Panel Statement: "We have found solid scientific grounds on
which to question the interpretation put upon the events of 9/11 by
the
Office of the President of the United States of America and
subsequently
propagated by the major media."
Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth
Bio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A._K._Dewdney
CV: http://www.csd.uwo.ca/faculty/akd/PERSONAL/hp.html

PEERS: 100 Professors Question The 9/11 Commission Report Richard%20Falk

Richard Falk, JSD

[url=][/url]

Richard Falk, JSD – Professor Emeritus, International
Law,
Professor of Politics and International Affairs, Princeton University. In

2001 he served on the three-person UN Commission on Human Rights for
the Palestine Territories, and previously, on the Independent
International Commission on Kosovo. He is the author or coauthor of numerous
books, including Religion
and Humane Global Governance; Human
Rights Horizons; On
Humane Governance: Toward a New Global Politics; and Human
Rights and State Sovereignty. Honorary Vice president of the
American Society of International Law.

Foreward to The
New Pearl Harbor: "The New Pearl Harbor
...
explores the most sensitive and controversial terrain—the broad
landscape of official behavior in relation to the 9/11 disaster—in
the best spirit of academic detachment coupled with ... a willingness to
allow inquiry to follow the path of evidence and reason wherever it
leads.
[It shows that] there are so many gaping holes in the official accounts
of 9/11 that no plausible coherent narrative remains.

"[Author David Ray] Griffin
shows,
with insight and a firm grasp of the many dimensions of global security

policy of the Bush Administration, that getting 9/11 right, even
belatedly, matters desperately. The layer upon layer of unexplained
facts, the multiple efforts by those in power to foreclose
independent inquiry, and the evidence of a pre-9/11
blueprint by Bush insiders to do what they are doing on the basis
of
a 9/11 mandate is why the Griffin assessment does not even require a
reader with a normally open mind. 30% receptivity will do, which
means that all but the most dogmatically blinded adherents of the Bush
presidency will be convinced by the basic argument of The New Pearl

Harbor." http://www.transnational.org/SAJT/forum/meet/2004/Falk...
Bio: http://www.ihc.ucsb.edu/events/event_files/past/_winter03/falk

PEERS: 100 Professors Question The 9/11 Commission Report John%20B%20Cobb%20230%20JPG80

John B. Cobb, Jr., PhD

[url=][/url]

John B. Cobb, Jr., PhD – Professor Emeritus of Theology
and
Co-Director of the Center for Process Studies at the Claremont School of
Theology. Prof. Cobb was a Fullbright professor at the University of
Mainz, and visiting professor at Vanderbilt, Harvard, and Chicago
Divinity
Schools. Author, co-author, and editor of numerous books on religion,
his
writings include; Biblical
Preaching on the Death of Jesus (1989), For
the Common Good co-authored with Herman Daly and winner of the
Grawemeyer Award for Ideas Improving World Order (1991), Sustaining
the Common Good : A Christian Perspective on the Global Economy
(1994), Christ
in a Pluralistic Age (1999), God
and the World (2001), The
Call of the Spirit: Process Spirituality in a Relational World
(2005).

Co-editor of 9/11 book: Joining the many
educated elite raising serious questions about possible involvement of
rogue elements of government in 9/11, Prof. Cobb was co-editor of a
landmark book from a religious perspective on this vital topic, 911
and American Empire (Vol II) – Christians, Jews and Muslims Speak
Out (2006).
Signatory: Petition requesting a
reinvestigation
of 9/11:

"We want truthful answers to questions. … As Americans
of
conscience, we ask for four things:
- Immediate investigation by NY Attorney General Eliot Spitzer
- Immediate investigation in Congressional hearings.
- Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.
- The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry."
  http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026...

Bio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_B._Cobb%2C_Jr.
CV: http://www.ctr4process.org/about/CoDirectors/cobb_cv.pdf

PEERS: 100 Professors Question The 9/11 Commission Report Steven%20JonesA%20230%20JPG80

Steven Jones, PhD

[url=][/url]

Steven Jones, PhD – Former Professor of Physics at
Brigham
Young University. Retired in October 2006 to devote more time to 9/11
research. Principal Investigator for experimental Muon-catalyzed fusion
from 1982 to 1991 for the U.S. Department of Energy. Author of over 40
papers published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

Peer reviewed paper, Why Indeed Did the WTC
Buildings
Completely
Collapse? in Journal of 9/11
Studies, 9/06: "On the basis of photographic and
video evidence as well as related data and analyses, I provide thirteen
reasons for rejecting the official hypothesis, according to which
fire and impact damage caused the collapse of the Twin Towers and WTC
7, in favor of the
controlled-demolition hypothesis. The goal of this paper is to promote
further scrutiny of the official government-sponsored reports as well as
serious investigation of the controlled demolition
hypothesis." http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200609...
[Editor's note: World Trade
Center Building 7 was 47 stories tall and was not hit by an airplane.
However, no mention of the reason for its collapse appears in the 9/11
Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances
surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch
the
collapse video here.]
Founder: Journal of 9/11
Studies
Member:
Scholars
for 9/11 Truth and Justice. Association Statement:
"Scholars
for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization consisting of
independent researchers and activists engaged in uncovering the true
nature of the 9/11 attacks."
Major media coverage: www.WantToKnow.info/steven...
Bio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_E._Jones

PEERS: 100 Professors Question The 9/11 Commission Report Howard%20Zinn%20220%20JPG80

Howard Zinn, PhD

[url=][/url]

Howard Zinn, PhD – Professor Emeritus of Political
Science,
Boston University. Historian, social activist, and author. Former U.S.
Army Air Corps bombardier in World War II. Author of numerous
books, including the highly popular A
People's History of the United States (1980 - 2005). Other
books of his are Howard
Zinn on Democratic Education (2004), Terrorism
and War (2002), and The
Zinn Reader (1997).

Endorsement of The
New Pearl Harbor: "David Ray
Griffin has done admirable and painstaking research in reviewing the
mysteries surrounding the 9-11 attacks. It is the most persuasive
argument I have seen for further investigation of the Bush
administration's relationship to that historic and troubling
event."
Endorsement of Debunking
9/11 Debunking: "Considering how the 9/11 tragedy
has been used by the Bush administration to propel us into immoral wars
again and again, I believe that David Ray
Griffin's provocative questions about 9/11 deserve to be investigated
and addressed."
Signatory: Petition requesting a
reinvestigation
of 9/11:

"We want truthful answers to questions. … As Americans
of
conscience, we ask for four things:
- Immediate investigation by NY Attorney General Eliot Spitzer
- Immediate investigation in Congressional hearings.
- Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.
- The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry."
  http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041026...

Bio: http://www.heartbone.com/supcourt/howard.htm
Rosemary Radford Ruether, PhD

[url=][/url]

Rosemary Radford Ruether, PhD – Professor Emerita,

Pacific School of Religion and Graduate Theological Union. Author and

editor of numerous books including; Four
Centuries of American Women's Religious Writing (1996), Women
and Redemption: A Theological History (1998), Christianity
and Ecology (2000), Christianity
and the Making of the Modern Family (2001), The
Wrath of Jonah (2002), Interpreting
the Postmodern: Responses to "Radical Orthodoxy"

(2006),

Encyclopedia
of Women And Religion in North America (2006).
Essay: "Until recently I dismissed the
suggestions that the Bush administration might have been complicit in
allowing 9/11 to happen as groundless "conspiracy theory." Thus
it was with some skepticism that I agreed to read the new
book written by David Ray
Griffin ... that argues the case for just such complicity.

"Griffin writes in a precise and careful fashion, avoiding
inflammatory rhetoric. He argues for a high probability for the Bush's
administrations complicity with allowing and facilitating the attacks,
based not on any one conclusive piece of evidence, but the sheer
accumulation of all of the data. He concludes by calling for a genuinely
independent investigative effort that would examine all this evidence.

"I personally found Griffin's book both convincing and
chilling. If the complicity of the Bush Administration to which he points
is true, then Americans have a far greater problem on their hands than
even the more ardent anti-war critics have imagined. If the
administration
... would do this, what else would they do to maintain and expand their
power?" http://www.thewitness.org/agw/ruether010804.html

Bio:http://www.cgu.edu/pages/3563.asp

PEERS: 100 Professors Question The 9/11 Commission Report Peter%20Phillips3%20220%20JPG80

Peter Phillips, PhD

[url=][/url]

Peter Phillips, PhD – Professor of Sociology, Sonoma

State

University. Director, Project
Censored. Author of several
books and chief editor of the highly regarded annual Project Censored

books which uncover vital news neglected by the major media. Prof.

Phillips is also a respected member of the intrepid WantToKnow.info team.

Essay 3/6/05: "A threshold concept facing
Americans is the possibility that the 9/11 Commission Report was on many
levels a cover-up for the failure of the US government to prevent the
tragedy. The report failed to address sources of external assistance to
the terrorists. Investigations into this area might have lead to a
conclusion that elements of various governments - including our own - not
only knew about the attacks in advance, but also may have helped
facilitate their implementation.

"Overall concerns with the official version of 9/11 have been
published and discussed by scholars
and politicians around the world. The response to most has been to
label these discussions as "conspiracy theories" unworthy of
media coverage or further review. Pursuit of a critical analysis of these
questions is undermined by the psychological barrier about 9/11 issues
as
threshold concepts — too awful to even consider.

"We must step past the threshold and have the courage to ask the
questions, demand answers, and support research into all aspects of this
American tragedy. Perhaps the closet isn't as dark and as fearful as we
envision. If we don't courageously look and search into the deepest
regions of our fears, how can we assure our children and ourselves a
safe
and honest future?" http://www.commondreams.org/views...
Bio: http://www.sonoma.edu/sociology/biopeter.htm

Daniele Ganser, PhD

[url=][/url]

Daniele Ganser, PhD – Professor in the History Department at the

University of Basel. Former Senior Researcher at the Center for Security

Studies at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. Former Researcher

at the Military Academy (MILAK) of the Swiss Federal Institute of

Technology.

Author of NATO's
Secret Armies, on the history of U.S.-sponsored false flag

operations in Europe after WW II.
Interview 4/8/05: "Academics who study
secret warfare find themselves between these three theories—LIHOP
[The US government knew the attack was coming, but Let It Happen On
Purpose], SURPRISE [The US government was not expecting the attack], and
INSIDE JOB [The U.S. government planned and executed the attack]. They
all are "conspiracy theories," by the way. Researchers try to
find out which theory is best able to account for all the known facts.

"But unfortunately, the 600-page [9/11 Commission] report,
published in July 2004 and accepted by Bush as the "official
story" of what happened in respect to 9/11, does not even mention
the LIHOP and INSIDE JOB theories! It presents SURPRISE as the only
possible explanation.

"Now, [9/11 Commission Executive Director] Philip Zelikow
is a respected professor of history. As a fellow historian I was
therefore very surprised to find that his report is totally unbalanced.
Of
course, Zelikow is aware of the LIHOP and INSIDE JOB theories, no doubt.
How can he author a book on 9/11, which claims to search for the truth,
but which totally ignores these theories?" http://www.danieleganser.ch/e/interviews...
Bio: http://www.danieleganser.ch/e/biographie/index.htm

PEERS: 100 Professors Question The 9/11 Commission Report John%20McMurtry%20JPG80

John McMurtry, PhD

[url=][/url]

John McMurtry, PhD – Professor of Philosophy, University

of Guelph. Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. Author of several

books dealing with public policy issues, including: Value
Wars: The Global Market Versus the Life Economy, and Unequal
Freedoms: The Global Market As an Ethical System.

Contributor to 9/11
and American Empire (Vol I): Intellectuals Speak Out:
"The documented details that expose 9/11 denial will not be repeated
here, because this volume and others have already reported them. They are
impressively massive in confirming ... the long open pathway to the
attacks and the blocking of all independent inquiry since then." www.snowshoefilms.com/mcm...
Signatory: Petition For An Independent
International 9/11 Truth Commission. "The Bush administration has
never offered a detailed and documented account of its claims about the
events of 9-11 which have allegedly revolutionized human affairs. Nor
has
it explained obvious and serious discrepancies in its own statements
and
actions. The Kean-Hamilton panel’s limited funding from Congress
makes a mockery of the tragedy of 9-11, considering that it is only a
small fraction of the huge sums spent to investigate Bill Clinton [for
his sexual indiscretions].

"We therefore call upon statesmen, thinkers,
journalists, investigators, artists, scientists, and other eminent
personalities from around the world to form an Independent International
Truth Commission dedicated to preventing unproven assertions about 9-11
from setting the stage for a new world conflagration." http://iitc.911review.org
Bio: http://www.uoguelph.ca/philosophy/faculty

PEERS: 100 Professors Question The 9/11 Commission Report Peter%20Dale%20Scott%20230%20JPG80

Peter Dale Scott, PhD

[url=][/url]

Peter Dale Scott, PhD – Professor Emeritus of English at

the University of California, Berkeley. Former Canadian diplomat who

served at the UN and the Canadian Embassy in Poland. Author of Drugs,
Oil and War (2003), and several other books including Deep
Politics and the Death of JFK (1996) and The
Iran-Contra Connection. Co-editor of 9/11
and American Empire (Vol I) – Intellectuals Speak Out

(2006). His writings deal, among other matters, with U.S. covert

operations and their impact on democracy at home and abroad. Prof. Scott

is also a respected member of the intrepid WantToKnow.info team.

Congressional briefing testimony 7/22/05: "The
American people have been seriously misled about the origins of the al
Qaeda movement ... just as they have been seriously misled about the
reasons for America's invasion of Iraq. The 9/11 Commission Report
assures Americans that 'Bin Ladin and his comrades had their own sources
of support and training, and they received little or no assistance from
the United States.' This misleading statement fails to consider that:

– Al Qaeda elements received considerable
indirect U.S. Government assistance, first in Afghanistan until
1992, and thereafter in other countries such as Azerbaijan (1992-95)

– Key members of the network which became al Qaeda,
such as Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, Ali Mohamed, Mohamed Jamal Khalifa, and
lead hijacker Mohammed Atta, were granted
visas
to enter the United States, despite being suspected of terrorism.

– Repeatedly al Qaeda terrorists were protected by FBI
officials from investigation and prosecution." [Editor's
note: See also Coleen Rowley and Bryan
Sacks.] http://socrates.berk...
Bio: http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~pdscott/

PEERS: 100 Professors Question The 9/11 Commission Report Michel%20Chossudovsky%20220%20JPG80

Michel Chossudovsky, PhD

[url=][/url]

Michel Chossudovsky, PhD – Professor of Economics,

University of Ottawa. Consultant to several international organizations

including the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the African

Development Bank, the United Nations African Institute for Economic

Development and Planning (AIEDEP), the United Nations Population Fund

(UNFPA), the International Labour Organization (ILO), the World Health

Organisation (WHO), the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin

America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). Prof. Chossudovsky is the author of several
important books, including his popular War
and Globalisation: The Truth Behind September 11.

Article 7/20/06: "What I've done in my
writings is to show that the official narrative or explanation regarding
9/11 can be refuted, namely that the official narrative is a lie.

"What the 9/11 Commission Report has submitted is an
extensive narrative of what happened on that day and what happened on
the
planes. And the evidence suggests that the 9/11 report is a lie.
It’s fabricated." http://www.globalresearch.ca/ind...
Over 100 Articles and Papers : http://www.globalresearch.ca/in...
Bio: http://www.transnational.org/SAJT/tff/people/m_choss...

In order not to make this email too long, we have included only 12 of

the over 100 respected professors questioning the 9/11 official story. To

access the

full list, visit the link below:

http://www.WantToKnow.info/070618professorsquestion911

For an abundance of reliable, verifiable information
suggesting a major cover-up of 9/11 including powerful videos, carefully
researched books, concise summaries of major media reports,
and most important, vital information on what we can do about

it, please visit:

http://www.WantToKnow.info/911information

Final Note: WantToKnow.info believes it is important

to balance disturbing cover-up information with inspirational writings

which call us to be all that we can be and to work together for

positive

change. Please visit our Inspiration Center at http://www.WantToKnow.info/inspirational

for an abundance of uplifting material.

See our archive of
revealing news articles at http://www.WantToKnow.info/medianewsarticles

Your tax-deductible donations, however large or small, help greatly to

support this important work.

To make a donation by credit card,

check, or money order:

http://www.WantToKnow.info/donationswtk

Explore

these empowering websites coordinated by the nonprofit PEERS network:

http://www.momentoflove.org

- Every person in the world has a heart

http://www.WantToKnow.info

- Reliable, verifiable information on major cover-ups

http://www.inspiringcommunity.org

- Building a Global Community for All

http://www.weboflove.org

- Strengthening the Web of Love that interconnects us all

Educational websites promoting transformation through information and

inspiration

» La Commission européenne face à la fuite des cerveaux
» Juifs déportés de Monaco: début du travail de la commission
» The Mitchell report
» An inside look at 9/11 report
» 20 Spankin' New Studies A Report From ACSM

PEERS: 100 Professors Question The 9/11 Commission Report

PEERS: 100 Professors Question The 9/11 Commission Report :: Commentaires

PEERS: 100 Professors Question The 9/11 Commission Report

Sujets similaires

Sujets similaires