MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE
Vous souhaitez réagir à ce message ? Créez un compte en quelques clics ou connectez-vous pour continuer.
MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE

Vues Du Monde : ce Forum MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE est lieu d'échange, d'apprentissage et d'ouverture sur le monde.IL EXISTE MILLE MANIÈRES DE MENTIR, MAIS UNE SEULE DE DIRE LA VÉRITÉ.
 
AccueilAccueil  PortailPortail  GalerieGalerie  RechercherRechercher  Dernières imagesDernières images  S'enregistrerS'enregistrer  Connexion  
Derniers sujets
Marque-page social
Marque-page social reddit      

Conservez et partagez l'adresse de MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE sur votre site de social bookmarking
QUOI DE NEUF SUR NOTRE PLANETE
LA FRANCE NON RECONNAISSANTE
Ephémerides

 

 A Question of Nutrition #2 by Dr. Jonny Bowden

Aller en bas 
AuteurMessage
mihou
Rang: Administrateur
mihou


Nombre de messages : 8092
Localisation : Washington D.C.
Date d'inscription : 28/05/2005

A Question of Nutrition #2 by Dr. Jonny Bowden Empty
30092008
MessageA Question of Nutrition #2 by Dr. Jonny Bowden

A Question of Nutrition #2
by Dr. Jonny Bowden


A noted nutrition guru tackles the topics of food allergies,
fasting, bulking diets, and that crappy weight-loss supplement your
wife wants to try.


Bulking Diets: Bashed!
Q: Most strength coaches agree that you need extra calories to
build muscle. The question is, how much extra? On one side you have
those who say to eat a few hundred calories per day over
maintenance levels. Others say to just eat a ton and train hard.
What do you think is best for the bodybuilding male?
A: "Train hard and eat a ton" sounds like a great
philosophy ... if you're training to be a Sumo
wrestler.
I think the "eat a ton and train hard" school is kind
of like practicing skeet shooting with a blindfold on. You might
hit the target, but you might also pull a Dick Cheney.
I think it's way smarter to start with a controlled amount
of extra calories and see if that's enough to do the trick.
Ask yourself how you're performing, what your energy is like,
and if you like the results in the mirror. If you're not
coming up with positive answers, adjust the calories some more
until you do.
If you're a bodybuilder, you're going to train hard
anyway, so all that's on the table here is how much to eat so
that most of that extra food goes into making muscle as opposed to
fat. "Eating a ton" is way too unscientific for most
bodybuilders these days.
A Question of Nutrition #2 by Dr. Jonny Bowden Image001


'Eat a ton and train hard" isn't too
scientific.


The Scoop on Fasting
Q: What do you think of intermittent fasting? I've read
about some plans that involve fasting for 24 hours every so often.
Some plans call for alternate-day fasting. It's said to
improve insulin sensitivity and increase longevity, among other
benefits. Any thoughts?
A: Many, actually. Are you surprised?

Fasting as a strategy to enhance health has been around since
the days of Hippocrates, the dude considered to be the father of
modern medicine. It's used by religious orders as a spiritual
discipline, and many high-end spas have some form of a fast —
often called a "detox" program — as part of their
rejuvenation retreats.

"Fasting and detoxification is the missing link in Western
nutrition," says my pal Elson Haas, MD, author of The New
Detox Diet.
Haas has been running detox programs as part of his medical
practice for more than 30 years.

"Fasting is the single greatest natural healing therapy I
know," he told me. "People need to take a break from
their substances. A fast or detox can give the body a rest so it
can rebalance."

But a true fast — even for one day — can be really
hard on the body. "A more common and liberal definition of
fasting would include the juices of fresh fruit and vegetables as
well as herbal teas," says Haas. "Fresh juices are easily
assimilated, require minimum digestion, and still supply many
nutrients. They also stimulate our body to clear wastes. Juice
fasting is safer than water fasting since it supports the body
nutritionally while cleansing and maintains your energy
level."
A Question of Nutrition #2 by Dr. Jonny Bowden Image003


You probably heard about the whole "alternate day"
stuff because of some mice experiments done at the University of
California at Berkeley. The researchers basically fasted (read:
starved) the poor mice on alternate days, and then allowed them to
eat whatever they wanted on the non-fast ("feast") days.

"We found that fasting can reduce cell proliferation rates
in skin and breast," lead researcher Krista Varady told me.
"That's equivalent to a decrease in both breast and skin
cancer risk."




I won't bore you with the details of the research, but they
actually found out that you didn't need to do a full-blown
fast on the "fast" days to get measurable benefits. You
could still consume about 25 percent of your normal food intake on
those "fasting" days — about the equivalent of one
meal — and still get value.

But don't use fasting as a weight-loss strategy. It
never works. Even in the mice experiments, the mice overcompensated
for their fast days by overfeasting on the eating days, so that at
the end of the week they had consumed the same amount of calories
as they normally would.

Since the only strategy that's ever worked to extend life
in the lab is calorie restriction, and since some theorists reason
that downregulating insulin signaling may be part of the reason,
eating fewer calories within the context of a high-nutrient diet
makes sense in general.

If you want to take a day off from regular eating every so often
and give your digestive system a rest, it's not a bad
idea.


Food Allergies and the Elimination Diet
Q: Is it true that if you eat a certain food all the time, you
can develop an allergy to it?
A: It's true that both allergies and food sensitivities
(which are much more common) can develop later in life, even with
foods you've been eating for a long time without any apparent
reactions.

The problem tends to be more common with what I call
"ubiquifoods"— foods or food ingredients (like
wheat) that are everywhere and that we consume in far greater
quantities than were ever in the human diet before now.

One great low-tech way to see how your body reacts to a food, or
to identify a possible "suspect", is to do an Elimination
Diet, which I discuss in my book, The Most Effective Natural
Cures on Earth.

It's real simple — detective work 101. You simply take the
potential offender out of your diet for a few weeks. If a symptom
— like a headache, brain fog, or tiredness — goes away,
bingo, you've discovered the culprit. It's often
possible to "rotate" that food back in by eating it, say,
once every four days.


An Alternative Sweetener?
Q: I recently heard that something called Xylitol powder can be
used as a sweetener. What is it and do you suggest it?
A: Xylitol is often called birch sugar because it's made
from birch tree bark. It's my favorite sweetener, not counting
a real food like blackstrap molasses, which has a very specific
taste. Xylitol has no real downside (unless you count knowing how
to spell it).

It tastes like sugar but has 40 percent fewer calories, you can
use it in hot beverages like coffee, and it has almost no glycemic
impact. Plus it has the added health benefit of helping to prevent
bacteria from adhering to tissue, making it the perfect sweetener
for a "healthy" chewing gum.

You can also bake with Xylitol, using it in the same quantity as
you would sugar. This makes it a perfectly healthy sugar
replacement for diabetics and low-carb dieters.
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
https://vuesdumonde.forumactif.com/
Partager cet article sur : reddit

A Question of Nutrition #2 by Dr. Jonny Bowden :: Commentaires

Is My Microwave Trying to Kill Me?
Q: Are microwaves really dangerous, or is that just
sky-is-falling nonsense from the tinfoil-hat crowd?
A: I'm on the fence. The conventional wisdom is that
they're perfectly safe, but that's also what the
conventional wisdom says about cell phones ... and I don't
think the jury has come in on that one yet.

It's kind of a given among the natural-foods crowd that
microwaving changes the "energetic" nature of food, but
this is really hard to prove, and easy to dismiss as the ramblings
of the tinfoil-hat crowd, if you're so inclined.

There was a lawsuit in 1991 concerning a hip-surgery patient who
died from a simple blood transfusion after the nurse heated the
blood in a microwave. (Blood is usually warmed for transfusions,
but not in a microwave.) This added fuel to the argument that more
goes on when we heat with microwaves than we might have previously
believed. But who really knows?

It's hard to get really good info on this — much like cell
phones — but a good summary of the arguments against microwaving
can be found here. Most of the
citations are of obscure European studies that are next to
impossible to locate, but still, it's pretty
creepy.

I do think food that's cooked in microwaves tastes pretty
awful. If heat from any source is all the same, a microwaved potato
should taste the same as a baked one, and it doesn't,
supporting the argument that more might be going on here than we
realize. You can prove that for yourself by microwaving a sweet
potato. Ugh.

Personally, I hardly ever use microwaves for cooking, but they
do make a great place to store junk mail.


Fish Oil for Depression
Q: Do fish oils really help with depression? I'm not
clinically depressed (no meds), but who couldn't use a mood
booster?
A: Yup. There's some good ongoing research on using fish
oil for
depression in bipolar folks, much of it by Dr. Andrew Stoll at
Harvard. They're using really big doses — 10 grams
— but lower doses may have an effect, especially when
combined with other nutrients like folic acid and a low-sugar diet

Good for lots of stuff, but depression? It
appears so!

Though this isn't proof, the fact is that virtually every
behavioral and cognitive disorder that's been investigated,
from ADD to aggression, has shown really low levels of omega-3s in
the bloodstream.

Since omega-3s get incorporated into the cell membranes, making
them more porous and flexible, it may make it easier for "feel
good" neurotransmitters like serotonin and dopamine to get in
there, translating to better mood.


Alli and Crap: Same Dif'
Q: My wife is insisting on trying that Alli weight loss
supplement because it's "FDA approved." Looks like
crap to me. What's the real deal with Alli?
A: Well, no one ever accused me of being a marriage counselor,
and certainly no one ever accused me of being politically correct,
so let me not mince words: You're right and your wife is
wrong. Alli is total crap. (Sorry, wife.)

But it does present a "teaching moment" for us. Sales
people, including drug manufacturers, love to use percentages
because you can be accurate but dishonest at the same time.




Suppose, for example, you have a one in 10 million chance of
winning the lottery, and I have a system to sell you that I can
guarantee will increase your odds of winning the lottery by 100
percent. What I've just done is up your odds from one in 10
million to two in 10 million!

Think of that the next time you read that people taking a weight
loss drug lost "43 percent more weight." Or someone
taking a bodybuilding supplement gained 37 percent more muscle.
Accurate, but bullshit. Often it means that the control group lost
one pound a month and the people taking the drug lost 1.43
pounds.

Alli is actually the non-prescription, lesser-strength version
of a drug that's been around for a while called Xenical. (The
generic name is orlistat.) It didn't work all that well when
it was Xenical and full-strength. I'm not sure why changing
the name and making the dosage smaller would fix the problem, but
hey, what do I know?

Alli is a member of a category of weight loss drugs that might
be called "digestive inhibitors." It blocks some of the fat that
you eat from being digested and assimilated. It does this by
blocking the digestive enzyme lipase, which breaks down fat.

The result? As much as 30 percent of the fat you eat doesn't go
to your hips. A side effect of the drug is euphemistically called
"anal leakage," which describes what happens to the fat
you didn't digest. Questions, anyone?

How 'bout this one: "What does it do to the fat that's already
on your hips?"

Answer: zip-a-dee-doo-dah.

The first big study to put Xenical on the map was a two-year
European study, which showed that patients on Xenical lost between
two and three percent more weight than those on a placebo. A second
two-year European trial put obese patients on a reduced-calorie
diet and gave them 120 mg of Xenical three times a day. At the end
of the year they'd lost about nine pounds more than the
placebo group.

Read that carefully. Nine pounds a year — which translates to
three-quarters of a pound a month. A similar study in the US
produced one-half pound per month for Xenical users.

People lose weight on Xenical — 'scuse me, Alli — because it essentially lowers caloric intake automatically.
If you, for example, were eating a nice, hefty 2,500 calories a day
and 30 percent of them happened to come from fat, you'd
normally be taking in 750 fat calories. By taking Xenical with a
fatty meal, about one-third of those fat calories aren't absorbed,
so the 750 calories becomes, theoretically, 500 calories.

You've "saved" 250 calories while eating the same meal. (Note
the operative word: theoretically.) Stick to that plan for a
week and you've "saved" 250 times seven calories, or a grand total
of 1,750 calories, or ... let's see ... one-half
pound?

Of course you could just cut calories and crappy carbs and skip
the Alli, but there isn't a $150 million marketing budget for
that idea.

So is Alli the answer? Hardly. Unless maybe you're a stockholder
in Glaxo.


Brown Rice: Healthy?
Q: I don't do well with carbs so my diet is pretty
carb-controlled. However, I've thought of adding brown rice.
What's the real story on brown rice: good for you or
overrated?
A: Not the worst thing, but overrated.

The glycemic index and glycemic load are both within spitting
distance of white rice, and overall brown rice is pretty thin
nutritionally. It does have more fiber, which is good — 3.5
grams per cup vs. just over a half gram for white rice — and
a tiny bit less carbs and calories.

Other than that, it's no great shakes. The dietitians love
it, but they also love "whole-wheat bread," which is
virtually the same crap as white bread.

But brown rice isn't the worst thing in the world. If you
want to add some carbs, small portions are okay, especially when
it's not the main course and is combined with fat, protein,
and vegetables in a relatively low-calorie meal.

Just don't think you're getting a free lunch if you
order one of those gargantuan Chinese-takeout-size portions of food
served on top of a quart of the stuff.


Apple Cider Vinegar: Quackery?
Q: Any truth to all the hype surrounding apple cider vinegar?
I've heard everything from weight loss claims to acne
prevention.
A: Ah, apple cider vinegar. You can be sure that if it had been
invented in the days of the multi-level marketers it would be sold
for $40 a bottle with claims that it can do everything from cure
cancer to grow hair on bald heads.

I wrote about apple cider vinegar in The 150 Healthiest Foods
on Earth
. Why? Because foods (or medicines) that have held on
to their reputation through hundreds, sometimes thousands, of years
of use should be paid attention to, even if there isn't any
hard "proof" of their value. Absence of proof is not
proof of absence.

So here's the thing: It's probably good stuff. But
there's hardly any science to back that up.

That's not to say it's not valuable. First of all, the
real stuff, made authentically, is going to be loaded with a lot of
the same phenols found in apples.

Second of all, a recent study in Diabetes Care suggests
that it may actually help with blood sugar and insulin. My friend
Jeff Volek, PhD, RD, a highly respected researcher, suggests a
salad with vinegar on it at the beginning of every meal for its
potential help with managing blood sugar.

Unpasteurized vinegar itself is loaded with nutrients, as many
as 50 different minerals, vitamins, and amino acids, depending on
the starting material for the vinegar.

A cure-all for everything? Probably not, and almost definitely
not a "weight loss" cure. But I keep it in my
refrigerator anyway.

Make sure you look for key terms like "unpasteurized,"
"unfiltered," "traditionally fermented" or
something along those lines. The pasteurization kills many of the
heat-sensitive vitamins and enzymes that make it a good food in the
first place.



About the Author
A Question of Nutrition #2 by Dr. Jonny Bowden Image005


Jonny Bowden, PhD, CNS, is a board-certified nutrition
specialist and a nationally known expert on weight loss and
nutrition. He has a master's degree in psychology and counseling
and a PhD in nutrition, and has earned six national certifications
in personal training and exercise. His books include: The 150
Healthiest Foods on Earth
, The Most Effective Natural Cures
on Earth
, and The Healthiest Meals on Earth. For info on
Dr. Bowden and his books and to sign up for his free newsletter,
visit his website.



© 1998 — 2008 Testosterone, LLC.
All Rights Reserved.
 

A Question of Nutrition #2 by Dr. Jonny Bowden

Revenir en haut 

Page 1 sur 1

 Sujets similaires

-
» Question of Nutrition: Vol 3 by Dr. Jonny Bowden
» La Nutrition:Ce que veulent les consommateurs
» Nutrition is more important than training
» Nutrition from crossfit.com
» The Truth About Nutrition

Permission de ce forum:Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE :: SANTE-SPORTS/HEALTH :: ALIMENTATION-HYGIENE DE VIE/ PROPER FOOD DIET--
Sauter vers: