MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE
Vous souhaitez réagir à ce message ? Créez un compte en quelques clics ou connectez-vous pour continuer.
MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE

Vues Du Monde : ce Forum MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE est lieu d'échange, d'apprentissage et d'ouverture sur le monde.IL EXISTE MILLE MANIÈRES DE MENTIR, MAIS UNE SEULE DE DIRE LA VÉRITÉ.
 
AccueilAccueil  PortailPortail  GalerieGalerie  RechercherRechercher  Dernières imagesDernières images  S'enregistrerS'enregistrer  Connexion  
Derniers sujets
Marque-page social
Marque-page social reddit      

Conservez et partagez l'adresse de MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE sur votre site de social bookmarking
QUOI DE NEUF SUR NOTRE PLANETE
LA FRANCE NON RECONNAISSANTE
Ephémerides
Le deal à ne pas rater :
Réassort du coffret Pokémon 151 Électhor-ex : où l’acheter ?
Voir le deal

 

 Starting Strength

Aller en bas 
AuteurMessage
mihou
Rang: Administrateur
mihou


Nombre de messages : 8092
Localisation : Washington D.C.
Date d'inscription : 28/05/2005

Starting Strength Empty
13082008
MessageStarting Strength

Starting Strength
An Interview with Mark Rippetoe
by Chris Colucci


What do you get when you combine 30 years of coaching experience
with a deep-seated need to teach as many people as possible the
benefits of lifting heavy iron? You get Mark Rippetoe, a guy who's
written not one, not two, but three of the most
comprehensive books explaining the basics of strength training, and
beyond.
Starting Strength Image002


Testosterone: Coach, I know you've been certified through the
NSCA since 1985 (with their first certification group), you've been
a competitive powerlifter, and you've been involved with Crossfit.
How'd it all come about?
Mark Rippetoe: I don't read around the web much, because I'm old
and busy, and just haven't got time. If I'm on the Internet, I'd
rather be looking at porn. So, I didn't really see anything about
Crossfit for a long time.

But it came to my attention a couple of years ago, and I just recognized it. I may have minor methodological problems with
them, but they're the only organization I see with momentum that's
moving in the right direction.

They advocate basic methods of human movement that all serious
trainers have used for a long time, and they've formalized the
process through randomness. Crossfit doesn't pretend that they're
anything but GPP [general physical preparation]. We're not saying
powerlifters need to do Crossfit. We're not saying Olympic
weightlifters need to do Crossfit, or bodybuilders.
Starting Strength Image003



This guy's workouts shouldn't involve doing 50 muscle-ups or
running a 5K.

But for people for whom the random use of their body, and
physical abilities, comes up at work or for certain sports,
Crossfit is the best program out there... for them. We're not
saying that it's anything else. But it is, quite literally, the
best synthesis of all this stuff that's been
formalized.

If you look at Crossfit from the standpoint of, 'This is what
they're trying to accomplish for these particular athletes,' I
don't see that there should be any controversy about it at
all.
T-Nation: Sometimes there does seem to be a misinterpretation of
those goals. While it's not ideal for bodybuilding, it does appeal
to a lot of firefighters, law enforcement, and the military. I
think people in those lines of work seem drawn to
it.
Rippetoe: I do too, because it works. One of the reasons our
methods fit into Crossfit so well, is because the stronger you are,
the more effective you are at Crossfit. Lots and lots of people
have figured that out through experience. And that's why we're so
widely accepted as a nice adjunct program, at least in terms of our
methods detailed in Basic Barbell Training.
Starting Strength Image005


T-Nation: One thing about the Starting Strength program that
I've noticed, especially because of the Internet, it that it's
starting to suffer from the telephone game syndrome. One person
read the book and figured they knew how to do it, then they told
someone else who tweaked it a bit, and they told two friends, and
they told two friends.
Here's the million-dollar question. What is the Starting
Strength program and why does it seem to work so
well?
Rippetoe: The Starting Strength program consists of the use of
basic barbell exercises. We primarily rely on the squat, bench
press, the deadlift, the press, and the power clean. And we
combined those exercises into very short, simple
workouts.

When we specifically speak of the Starting Strength program,
we're talking about its application to novice athletes. This
is extremely important to understand, and this is kind of the
premise for Practical Programming for Strength Training, our second book.



Starting Strength Image007



When a person first starts training, I mean first rattle out of
the box, an 18-year old kid comes in the gym and starts training,
he's so unadapted that riding a bicycle will make his bench press
go up. The further removed you are from your potential to adapt,
the quicker and easier adaptation is.

The Starting Strength program takes into account the fact that
there are just a few basic exercises that, when done in a
program of strict linear increase — come in, do 3x5 after
your warm-up, go up 10 pounds in your next workout, and do that
until it doesn't work anymore — they produce a total body
adaptation that's superior to the use of exercises that dilute the
body into bodyparts.

In other words, we don't think, "legs." We think, "squat." We
don't attempt to assemble a complete workout from bodyparts. We
don't have muscle groups that are favorites; we don't think in
terms of muscle groups. We think in terms of
movements.

I don't really coach but seven or eight exercises. We squat, and
press overhead, we deadlift, we bench press, we clean, we snatch.
We occasionally do barbell rows, but we don't really use
barbell rows in our program.
T-Nation: That's actually one of those telephone game problems
that's popped up. Any reason for not using rows
much?
Rippetoe: It's a decent assistance exercise, and so are dips. I
don't really want to put chins or pull-ups in that list, because
they're essential upper body exercises. I think chin-ups and
barbell rows are in two different categories. But we don't
really use barbell rows, and I think that's one of the puzzling
things that developed on the Internet.

I think rows are in a lot of these spin-offs of my program
because people need another exercise off the floor besides
deadlifts, but everybody's afraid to learn the clean. I don't
really understand it, except that, in people's minds, rows are
easier to learn. They look slow, they don't look as
complicated.

I think I did a decent job of explaining the clean in the book,
and I think it's a much better exercise than the barbell row.
Because it can't be done slowly. That's why we use it. It's
an explosive lift.
T-Nation: You're okay with recreational lifters using the
Olympic lifts? Do you think Average Joes can benefit from
them?
Rippetoe: Sure! Oh, God yes. For the same reasons, they
can't be done slowly. You have to explode to do a snatch and a
power clean. And explosive training recruits more motor units than
slow training.

To do things very, very slowly because it makes your muscles
burn seems rather silly to me. It's like making your pecs burn.
Just gotta get the pump, right?
T-Nation: Aw come on, everyone loves the occasional pump.
Another major criticism of the Starting Strength program comes from
squatting three times a week. People say it's "bad" for the lower
back. Just like they say you shouldn't squat and deadlift in the
same workout.
Rippetoe: Sure you can... if you're a novice. (laughs)
T-Nation: So it all comes back to experience being part of the
program design?
Rippetoe: Yeah. The point of the whole thing is that your
training program must reflect your level of training advancement.
You wouldn't put a person who's been a competitive lifter for 10
years on this simple, novice program because they won't benefit
from it.
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
https://vuesdumonde.forumactif.com/
Partager cet article sur : reddit

Starting Strength :: Commentaires

mihou
Re: Starting Strength
Message Mer 13 Aoû - 10:38 par mihou
By the same token, you don't start an inexperienced 18 year old
kid on a Louie Simmons program. That's not what it's for. Westside
programs are for competitive powerlifters who are, by definition,
intermediate or advanced lifters.
Starting Strength Image009



Coach Rippetoe walking the walk, back in the
day.
But kids that are just starting out can squat three days a week
and pull three days a week. They need that. Because if they don't,
they're wasting the opportunity to get strong quickly. And that's
what our whole program is about. It's about making the most of the
period of time when you can make the most rapid, easy
progress.



T-Nation: But is Starting Strength effective regardless of
someone's eventual goal? Would the "I wanna be a bodybuilder"-guy
and the "I wanna be a powerlifter"-guy both start with this
plan?
Rippetoe: Right, because all beginners have the same problem. It
doesn't matter what they want to do eventually. If I have a 6-foot
kid who weighs 155 pounds, what's his problem? Whether he wants to
be a bodybuilder, he wants to be a powerlifter, an Olympic
weightlifter, or a thrower, what's his problem?

He's little. He's 6-foot and weighs 155. And our program is the
best way to get him to 6-foot, 195.
T-Nation: So it's a good plan for size, too? I guess calling the
book "Starting Size and Strength" would've been too
long.
Rippetoe: Oh, yeah. The primary effect of our program is
muscular bodyweight gain. That's where our famous gallon of milk a
day program comes in. A gallon of whole milk, each day, is our
standard recommendation for people who need to gain
weight.

And nothing works better than a linear progression on
simple barbell exercises, that has you go up in weight every
workout, while you're gaining weight because you're drinking a
gallon of milk a day. I have seen people put on 50 pounds of
muscular bodyweight. We do it all the time, and it works
beautifully.

I'll go on record as saying that steroids don't work as well as
this. This program works better for novices than steroids.
Absolutely yes.
T-Nation: Even though it's a non-traditional plan with lower
reps and lower volume?
Rippetoe: Quite the contrary, I think this is a much more
traditional program. It just depends on how far back you go for the
tradition. If you go back to Arthur Jones in 1974, and Nautilus,
with the modern health club model, then yeah, this is probably
non-traditional.

But all of my training comes from Bill Starr and the old guys
back in the '50s. I've not invented anything here. All I've done is
write it back down. If you look at writings from years ago, like
Stuart McRobert, and Bradley J. Steiner in Ironman, and Bill back
in the Strength and Health magazine days, they'll all tell you the
same thing.

Keep it simple. Get strong. Add more weight when you train, as
often as you can. Eat clean and eat a lot. Get good sleep, and
you'll make progress. All I did was detail it for people who don't
have access to that old information.
T-Nation: You said the Starting Strength program could work for
an 18-year old kid, but you have lots of experience coaching
younger kids too. A lot of people think little kids and weights
shouldn't mix.
Rippetoe: We start with little kids.
T-Nation: Like what, elementary school? Junior
high?
Rippetoe: Sure, anyone. But you have to teach them the correct
movements. See, this is one of the problems I have with most of the
people in the medical community. Just like they say squats are bad
for the knees. Well, you don't get to define a squat as a quarter
squat. That's not what a squat is, boys and girls.
Starting Strength Image011


A squat is the full range of motion exercise that involves you
lowering a bar held on your body eccentrically, and then raising it
up after your femurs have broken the plane of parallel to the
ground. That's the squat.

And you can do that wrong or you can do that right. But you
don't get to do it high and call it a "squat" or call it
"bad for the knees." You don't teach little kids how to do these
exercises incorrectly, and then come back and say that the problems
caused by doing them incorrectly are the fault of barbell
training.

Furthermore, they're not strong enough to use enough weight to
hurt themselves, which is one real good argument against quarter
squats. You can lift big weights in quarter squats. But if you have
to go all the way down below parallel, and stand all the way back
up with the weight, you're not going to be able to do it until you
get really strong. That goes for adults and
children.

Now, what's normally thrown out is epiphysial fractures. That's
mythology. Find me the examples of epiphysial damage done in
barbell training done correctly. There aren't any. It's
pediatrician bullshit, and it essentially boils down to people
speaking outside their specialty. Pediatricians, doctors, and
orthopedic surgeons are trained in medicine, in how to repair
things that are already damaged.




That does not mean they know how to exercise. Just because your
mechanic knows how to work on your car doesn't mean he knows how to
get you around downtown Boston.

Kids are fine training with proper instruction, with full range
of motion exercise, with correct coaching. It's not any worse than
it is to have them doing gymnastics when they're four or
five.

I have a bar in my gym that weighs 11 pounds. I can make that
bar weigh 12 pounds next time. And then I can make it weigh 13
pounds, and 80 pounds, and finally 245 pounds. I can make my
barbell directly scalable to the ability of an eight year old
kid.

Conversely, you put that same eight year old, 75-pound kid on a
soccer field and have him run head-on into another 75-pound kid, is
that event scalable? Uh... no. "Hey, undeveloped epiphyses. Still
open epiphyses!" And then put cleats on him, have him spin and kick
and get hit in the knees.

Yet, how many orthopedic surgeons and pediatricians will
recommend against kids playing soccer, versus recommending against
kids participating in barbell training programs? Doesn't make any
sense, does it?
T-Nation: No, but that's the norm.
Rippetoe: The norm. The conventional wisdom. Conventional wisdom
is that soccer, which is in fact the most dangerous sport on earth,
is fine for kids, but barbell training will stunt their growth.
Stupid shit like that.
T-Nation: Speaking of stupid shit, or rather, crazy shit, a
section of your book Strong Enough?: Thoughts from Thirty Years
of Barbell Training
talked about the mental benefits of 20-rep
squats. Can you go a bit more into that?
Starting Strength Image013


Rippetoe: This isn't something I dreamed up. Strossen's written
about it. Perry Rader's old programs from the '40s and '50s
involved 20-rep squats. 20-rep squats are not a beginner's
thing, because beginners can't possibly do them correctly. But for
an intermediate lifter who wants to take six or eight weeks and
grow some legs, 20-rep squats do a marvelous job.

It does make you tough. But most people can't stand to do the
damn thing. If you're doing it right, you won't go more than six or
eight weeks. You just can't. At least I couldn't, and I'm kind of
stupid about that kind of stuff.

For an actual, no shit, set of 20 squats, you're going to pick a
weight that you previously thought was your 10-rep max. And
you're going to do 10 reps with it. Then you're going to do the
11th rep, and you're gonna breathe a little bit. And finally,
you're gonna finish the 19th rep, and Jesus is gonna be talking to
you about this time.

Then you're gonna finish the 20th rep, and you'll somehow get it
back in the rack, and then you collapse. You'll get tunnel vision
and your hearing will change while you're trying to catch your
breath. All kinds of weird peripheral central nervous system
effects will take place.

What you normally find is that you're laying on the ground, and
you think, "Oh my God, I'm so glad that's over with." And then
after about five minutes, the realization occurs, "I gotta do this
again next week with another ten pounds. Oh shit."

Most people can't deal with that for a long period of time. But
it's terribly useful for short periods of time.
T-Nation: To switch gears, even though you're primarily a
strength coach, summer's here and we all get a little 6-pack happy.
Do you have any tips about fat loss for recreational lifters or
athletes?
Rippetoe: Oh, sure... Zone Diet.
T-Nation: No, seriously.
Rippetoe: Barry Sears' Zone Diet works every time
I've seen it tried. I know lots of people in Crossfit that need to
gain weight, in my opinion. But I also know lots and lots of people
in Crossfit that are carrying 8% bodyfat, and they all got there by
doing Crossfit-type training and the Zone Diet.

It's weird how fast it works. Every time I put people on the
Zone Diet, their Crossfit performance improves and their bodyfat
goes down. If you want to drop a bunch of fat in two months, go
straight to Crossfit and the Zone Diet. Say what you want to, but
it works better than anything else I've ever seen.
T-Nation: It's been interesting stuff so far, but unfortunately,
we have to wrap up. Any closing thoughts?
Rippetoe: Again, I haven't invented anything in these methods.
I've just organized all the stuff I've learned from Bill Starr and
lots of other people into an easily managed, easily followed
method.

Now, one thing I probably could take credit for doing is just
taking the time to describe these five exercises in more detail
than anybody else has ever done. And if I've made an actual
contribution to the literature, it's probably in that respect. We
saw a need for a book that spent more than two pages on
squatting.
T-Nation: You've definitely given us that, and so much more. I
appreciate you taking the time to explain things.

For More About Mark Rippetoe

Mark Rippetoe runs the Wichita Falls Athletic Club in Wichita Falls, Texas. His books Starting Strength: Basic Barbell Training, Practical
Programming for Strength Training
, and Strong Enough?:
Thoughts from Thirty Years of Barbell Training
can be found at
www.aasgaardco.com.



© 1998 — 2008 Testosterone,
LLC. All Rights Reserved.
 

Starting Strength

Revenir en haut 

Page 1 sur 1

 Sujets similaires

-
» Pillars of Strength
» Question of Strength
» Stretch for More Strength
» The Reg Park Way To Serious Size And Strength
» Question of Strength: October

Permission de ce forum:Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE :: SANTE-SPORTS/HEALTH :: EXERCICES ET CONDITIONNEMENT PHYSIQUES/EXERCISES AND CONDITIONING-
Sauter vers: