Strength Training For Fighters
- 15 Random Thoughts -
By Ross Enamait - Published in 2006First Things FirstSeveral years ago, I provided a brief overview of strength training for
boxers. It was a basic summary, which was unfortunately misquoted and
often misinterpreted. Due to the continued confusion, I have created
this article to address several important topics. There are those who
continue to despise the thought of strength training for competitive
fighters. This article will shed light on this often-debated topic. The
material presented herein is not specific to any fighting style. The
focus of this article is strength training for the combat athlete.
Let’s now proceed to 15 random thoughts…
1. Strength TrainingNotice how this article is entitled
strength training and not
weight training.
There is a difference between these two phrases. Strength training
involves the use of resistance exercise in the pursuit of increased
strength. Resistance can come from several sources such as bodyweight
(ex. pull-ups), free weights, medicine balls, odd-objects (ex.
sandbags), and resistance bands. Each tool is simply a means to an end.
No tool will guarantee results. No tool is better or worse than
another. Each tool offers value if used correctly.
Many old-school trainers frown upon free weights, yet encourage
bodyweight exercise. This is an illogical mindset however, as each form
of training can produce similar results. Free weights are not better or
worse than bodyweight exercise. There are many fighters who swear by
free weights, while others prefer traditional methods such as
bodyweight exercise. There have been successful fighters from both
sides of the fence. To deny this fact is a demonstration of nothing
more than ignorance.
The tool is simply a means to an end2. Strength Training Is NOT BodybuildingMany old school trainers cringe at the thought of weight lifting, as
their interpretation of this phrase is akin to bodybuilding. The phrase
weight lifting causes one to automatically envision large, muscle-bound
bodybuilders.
Let’s get one thing clear…
A fighter has no business following a bodybuilding routine.
Bodybuilding emphasizes aesthetics. The activity involves posing
various muscle groups for a panel of judges. There is no concern for
athletic qualities such as speed, power, and endurance. An athlete
trains for function. A fighter will not gain points on the judge’s
scorecard by crafting a symmetrical pair of pectoral muscles. To
compare strength training for a fighter to bodybuilding is like
comparing a fresh orange to an artificial apple.
Please note that this is not a knock against bodybuilding. Bodybuilding
is simply not the ideal strength regimen for a competitive fighter.
3. What Is Strength?Many critics of strength training for fighters do not understand the
numerous strength qualities that exist. Strength is commonly described
as the
ability to exert a force against a resistance. This simple definition is not enough however. We must instead examine more specific strength qualities.
Maximal Strength – Maximal strength is
defined as the amount of force that one can exert under voluntary
effort. Max-strength is developed by lifting heavy loads, or through
bodyweight methods such as isometrics and the use of strenuous
rep-for-rep movements.
Explosive Strength – Explosive strength is defined as the ability to express significant tension in minimal time.
Vladimir Zatsiorsky, highly regarded sport biomechanist and former
strength and conditioning consultant for the Soviet Union Olympic
teams, has stated specifically that:
“The ability to produce maximal forces in minimal
time is called explosive strength. Strong people do not necessarily
possess explosive strength.” (1)
Clearly, the development of one strength quality (ex. max-strength)
does not guarantee the development of another (ex. explosive strength).
This information may come as a surprise to many athletes who focus all
of their strength work to one specific strength quality (ex. the
athlete who only lifts heavy loads to development maximal strength).
Explosive strength is a critical strength quality for all competitive athletes.
Speed Strength – Speed strength is
defined as the ability to quickly execute an unloaded movement or a
movement against a relatively small external resistance. For example,
working with a punch-out drill against the heavy bag would equate to
the execution of a relatively small external resistance, as the weight
of the glove is insignificant.
For more information regarding punch-out drills, please refer to the link below:
Intensifying The Heavy Bag Speed strength is also very important for fighters. Unfortunately, many
athletes train improperly, hence sacrifice this strength quality. For
example, world-renowned sport scientist Yuri Verkhoshansky and
colleagues established that:
“Excessive maximum strength training can impair speed-strength and technical skill in boxers.” (2)
Strength Endurance – Strength
endurance is defined as the ability to effectively maintain muscular
functioning under work conditions of long duration. Strength endurance
is a vital strength quality for any combat athlete. Power and speed are
useless without the stamina necessary to apply these physical
attributes throughout the contest.
And contrary to the opinion of many, free weights can be effectively used to enhance a fighter’s endurance. For example,
this routine offers a high-speed conditioning challenge, ideal for any combat athlete.
4. Multifaceted CompetitionCombat sporting events are multifaceted in nature. One must be
well-rounded in terms of his strength preparation. It is not enough to
develop one strength quality at the expense of all others. A fighter
requires a unique blend of each strength quality.
5. Basic Anatomy and PhysiologyAfter reading that excess max-strength can impair speed strength, you
may initially assume that heavy weight lifting is harmful for fighters.
This is not true however.
Many old school trainers believe heavy weights will lead to excess bulk
and reduced speed. This is a myth. Although excessive development of
max-strength can pose problems, this strength quality is still
important (if trained in moderation).
To understand the relevance of maximal strength training, it is
important to first understand how the body functions. Once you
understand the body, there is no disputing the relevance of maximal
strength training.
For starters, muscle fibers are grouped into motor units. A
motor unit contains hundreds of muscle fibers and one nerve, which
delivers a signal to the muscle fibers. All of the muscle fibers
contained within the motor unit are of the same type (fast twitch or
slow twitch). When a signal is passed for the motor unit to contract,
all of the fibers within that motor unit will contract.
When training for power development, we must target the fast twitch
muscle fibers. Unfortunately, not all motor units are activated at
once. Low intensity exercise does not activate the fast twitch muscle
fibers. If the exercise does not stimulate a fast twitch motor unit,
the muscle fibers contained within the unit will not adapt to the
training. Essentially, if the motor unit is not recruited, no response
occurs.
Thus, if you only lift very light loads, you will not
adequately target the fast twitch muscle fibers. When lifting heavy
loads (training maximal strength), a high percentage of motor units are
activated. During such intense loads, fast twitch motor units are
recruited. For this reason, maximal strength training is considered the
superior method for improving both intramuscular and intermuscular
coordination.
So, while excessive max-strength training can lead to
problems, this strength quality must not be ignored. Through proper
program design, max-strength training can be used to enhance the power
potential of any athlete (ie. improve your ability to recruit, hence
utilize your fast twitch muscle fibers).
6. What About Speed?Many will read of heavy weight training and falsely assume that such
methods will negatively influence speed. One common myth suggests that
heavy weight training will lead to unnecessary bulk, which consequently
will reduce range of motion and speed development. This is completely
untrue.
Consider a powerful football player who sprints 40 yards in less than 5
seconds. Clearly, weight training does not influence his speed. What
about the 100 meter sprinter who covers this distance in less than 10
seconds? Weight training does not influence his speed potential either.
When you understand how the body functions, you will quickly realize
that a strength program designed to enhance the efficiency of the fast
twitch muscle fibers will not harm speed potential. On the contrary,
the right program can assist with speed production.
As stated in perhaps the best translated Russian text from Yuri Verkhoshansky,
Special Strength Training – A Practical Manual For Coaches:
“When effective methodology is used, exercises
with resistance promote not only an increase in movement speed but also
perfection of coordination, motor reaction, quickness and frequency of
movements, the ability to relax muscles, development of local muscular
endurance and an increase in maximal anaerobic capacity.” (3)
7. What About Flexibility?Another common myth related to strength training deals with flexibility
and range of motion. Many trainers believe that free weights will
compromise flexibility. This is completely untrue.
A proper strength program will enhance range of motion. To
those who disagree, I ask you to perform this simple experiment.
Perform an overhead squat and you will see just how much flexibility
can be developed with proper exercise selection.
See the link below for a demonstration of the overhead squat.
Overhead SquatOlympic lifters also offer a perfect example of power and
flexibility. The two competitive Olympic lifts (Snatch and
Clean-and-Jerk) demand these two physical attributes. The individuals
engaged in Olympic weight lifting are amongst the most powerful
athletes in the world. These men and women do not possess the
muscle-bound physiques seen in bodybuilding. These individuals are
powerful, flexible, and extremely athletic.
For another example, look at the flexibility of a gymnast. These
athletes possess tremendous strength, yet remain as flexible as any
athlete in the world. Clearly, the strength work of these gymnasts has
not compromised their range of motion.
There is no disputing the fact that strength can be developed without harming range of motion and flexibility.
8. What About Bulk?Many coaches steer clear of strength training for fear that the work
will lead to unnecessary mass gains. After all, combat athletes compete
in specific weight classes. Why would an athlete wish to gain mass if
they are already struggling to make weight (as many do)?
Once again, strength training will not lead to mass if the
athlete utilizes the correct program, while also paying careful
attention to his nutritional intake. The food that you consume is the
real cause of weight gain (or loss).
The following quote from the definitive
Supertraining text will shed light on this subject:
“Strength is not primarily a function of muscle
size, but one of the appropriate muscles powerfully contracted by
effective nervous stimulation.” (4)
If you wish to gain strength, you must target the nervous system. This
can be effectively done without weight gain. We can revert back to the
Olympic weight lifter for another perfect example. These athletes
compete within specific weight classes. They are able to gain strength
without gaining weight.
The nervous system is the true indicator of strength, not bulky muscles.
9. No GuaranteesAs stated earlier (but worth repeating), the development of one
strength quality does not ensure the development of another. Distinct
strength properties are often unrelated. One can possess tremendous
strength in one form (ex. max-strength), while lacking in other areas
(ex. speed-strength).
The lesson to be learned is very simple. Don’t put all of your eggs
into one basket. A complete athlete must follow a complete plan. Each
strength quality must be considered in the creation of the program.
Mar 4 Déc - 22:30 par mihou