This
message
is available online at http://www.WantToKnow.info/070906statesecretsprivilegeceocompensationcancercures
Dear friends,
Below
are one-paragraph excerpts of important news articles you may have
missed.
These news articles include revealing information on a new possible
cancer
cure, increasing use of the "state secrets" privilege by the U.S.
government, skyrocketing C.E.O. compensation, and more. Each excerpt is
taken verbatim from the major media website listed at the link provided.
If any link fails to function, click
here.
Key sentences are highlighted for those with
limited
time. By choosing to educate ourselves and to spread
the word, we can and will build a brighter
future.
With
best wishes,
Tod Fletcher and Fred
Burks for PEERS and the WantToKnow.info Team
"Fascinating" Possible Cancer
TreatmentSeptember 2, 2007, CBS
Newshttp://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/08/27/earlyshow/health/main3206892.shtml
For
most,
a cancer diagnosis can be devastating. But for John Kanzius it was a call
to action. Kanzius isn't a doctor. He doesn't even have a college degree.
Yet ... the device he invented has impressed a notable researcher and
inspired his hometown, Erie, Pa., to the point where it gave him a key to
the city in April. Asked by [a reporter] what made him think he could
cure
cancer, Kanzius replied with a laugh, "Nobody else was doing it! I
envision
this treatment taking no more than a couple of minutes or so." Kanzius
hopes cancer treatments could work something like this: A patient would
be
injected with tiny metal nano-particles, which would be carried through
the
bloodstream by a targeting molecule and attach only to cancerous cells.
The
patient would then be exposed to an energy field created by radio waves,
and feel nothing, while the nano-particles would generate enough heat to
destroy their cancerous host cell. Kanzius demonstrated just how easily
the nano-particles could be used as receivers. A lab worker injected
carbon nano-particles into a specific spot in a piece of liver, which was
then placed into an energy field of low frequency radio waves. Within
seconds, the areas injected the with nano-particles were heated to the
point of actually cooking the liver, while leaving the surrounding meat
unscathed.
Kanzius' invention has caught the attention of Dr.
Steven Curley, a surgical oncologist and cancer researcher at MD Anderson
Cancer Center in Houston.
"This has the most fascinating potential I've seen in anything in my
twenty years of cancer research," Curley [said]. Curley has
developed current methods of using radio frequencies to attack cancer,
but
says he looks forward to one day using a non-invasive approach like the
one
Kanzius is working on.
Note:For a treasure trove of reliable information about exciting possible
cancer
cures, click
here.
U.S. Cites ‘Secrets’ Privilege to Stop Suit on
Banking RecordsAugust 31, 2007, New York
Timeshttp://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/31/us/nationalspecial3/31swift.html
The Bush
administration ... plans to turn again to a legal tool, the “state
secrets” privilege, to try to stop a suit against a Belgian banking
cooperative [known as Swift] that secretly supplied millions of private
financial records to the United States government. The “state secrets”
privilege, allowing the government to shut down litigation on national
security grounds, was once rarely used. The Bush administration has
turned
to it more than 30 times, seeking to end public discussion of cases like
the claims of an F.B.I. whistle-blower and the abduction of a German
terrorism suspect. Most notably, the administration has sought to use the
privilege to kill numerous suits against telecommunications carriers over
the National Security Agency’s eavesdropping program.
Swift is
considered the nerve center of the global banking industry, routing
trillions of dollars each day among banks, brokerage houses and other
financial institutions. Its partnership with Washington ... gave Central
Intelligence Agency and Treasury Department officials access to millions
of records on international banking transactions. Months after
the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Swift began turning over large chunks of its
database in response to a series of unusually broad subpoenas from the
Treasury Department. Two American banking customers ... sued Swift on
invasion-of-privacy grounds. [Steven E. Schwarz, the lawyer for the
plaintiffs, said the Swift program] “is an Orwellian example of
government
overreaching and unfettered access to private financial information that
is
not consistent with the values upon which our country was founded. We’ve
seen a real erosion of the ‘state secrets’ privilege in the last year. I
think it is from overuse. We’ve seen it used in record numbers, in
situations where it was inappropriate, and the courts are starting to
recognize that.”
Government secrecy up despite exposure of
issueAugust 31, 2007, Seattle
Post-Intelligencer/Cox News Servicehttp://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/329978_secrecy02.html
Government
secrecy is expanding at an unprecedented clip, despite growing public
concern about barriers to information. OpenTheGovernment.org
reports
that
stamping government documents "secret" cost American
taxpayers
$8.2 billion last year -- a 7.5 percent increase over the year before.
The
coalition found that for every dollar spent declassifying documents, the
federal government spends $185 to conceal government documents.Open-government advocates blame the policies of the Bush administration.
"The current administration has increasingly refused to be held
accountable to the public," said Patrice McDermott, executive director of
the coalition of conservative and liberal groups concerned about
government secrecy. "These practices lead to the circumscription of
democracy." Among the findings from the report: Businesses enjoyed a
no-bid process for 26 percent, or $107.5 billion, of the federal
government's business last year. President Bush has issued at least 151
signing statements challenging 1,149 provisions of laws passed by
Congress. The Defense Department has more than doubled in real terms the
amount it spends on classified weapons acquisitions since 1995. The
number
of documents [classified in 2006] ballooned to 20.3 million, up by 43
percent. And those figures do not include the untold number of documents
that are locked away by federal agencies in categories known as
"pseudo-classification." These are unclassified documents that government
bureaucrats deem too sensitive for public consumption. The report also
found that the Bush administration has invoked a legal tool known as the
"state secrets" privilege more than any other previous administration to
get cases thrown out of civil court.
CEO pay: 364 times more than
workersAugust 29, 2007, Money
magazinehttp://money.cnn.com/2007/08/28/news/economy/ceo_pay_workers/index.htm
Pay
comparisons almost always leave someone feeling dwarfed, and none more so
than the CEO-to-worker pay gap. But even CEOs have reason to feel
seriously dwarfed these days, thanks to the outsized paychecks of private
equity and hedge fund managers. The average CEO of a large U.S. company
made roughly $10.8 million last year, or 364 times that of U.S. full-time
and part-time workers, who made an average of $29,544, according to a
joint analysis released Wednesday by the liberal Institute for Policy Studies and United for a Fair Economy. The IPS
and UFE pay-gap numbers are also wider than some other measures of
CEO-to-worker pay because they count both full-time and part-time workers
in their calculations, which effectively lowers workers' average pay due
to fewer hours worked. If you just consider the average compensation
(wages plus benefits) of full-time year-round workers in non-managerial
jobs - roughly $40,000 - CEO pay is more like 270 times bigger than the
average Joe's. That's still a far cry from days gone by. In 1989, for
instance, U.S. CEOs of large companies earned 71 times more than the
average worker, according to the Economic
Policy Institute. The top 20 CEOs of U.S. companies made an average
of
$36.4 million in 2006. The pay gap numbers don't include the value of the
many perks CEOs receive, which averaged $438,342, according to the
report.
Nor do they include the pension benefits CEOs receive. But even including
all that,
CEO pay can look like chump change next to private
equity and hedge fund managers' pay. Those managers made an average of
$657.5 million in 2006 - more than 16,000 times what the average
full-time
worker makes, and roughly 61 times that of the average CEO.
Jeu 6 Sep - 11:28 par mihou