MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE
Vous souhaitez réagir à ce message ? Créez un compte en quelques clics ou connectez-vous pour continuer.
MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE

Vues Du Monde : ce Forum MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE est lieu d'échange, d'apprentissage et d'ouverture sur le monde.IL EXISTE MILLE MANIÈRES DE MENTIR, MAIS UNE SEULE DE DIRE LA VÉRITÉ.
 
AccueilAccueil  PortailPortail  GalerieGalerie  RechercherRechercher  Dernières imagesDernières images  S'enregistrerS'enregistrer  Connexion  
Derniers sujets
Marque-page social
Marque-page social reddit      

Conservez et partagez l'adresse de MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE sur votre site de social bookmarking
QUOI DE NEUF SUR NOTRE PLANETE
LA FRANCE NON RECONNAISSANTE
Ephémerides
-29%
Le deal à ne pas rater :
DYSON V8 Origin – Aspirateur balai sans fil
269.99 € 379.99 €
Voir le deal

 

 Iraq: What Iran and Syria want

Aller en bas 
AuteurMessage
mihou
Rang: Administrateur
mihou


Nombre de messages : 8092
Localisation : Washington D.C.
Date d'inscription : 28/05/2005

Iraq: What Iran and Syria want Empty
13112006
MessageIraq: What Iran and Syria want

Iraq: What Iran and Syria want
By Martin Asser
BBC News

Syria and Iran - two of the most vilified nations in the Bush administration's political atlas - could hold the key to saving American plans in their neighbour Iraq.

Washington may need the two regional allies to help stabilise Iraq in order to pull its own troops back from an increasingly unpopular commitment there.

But given its fraught relations with Tehran and Damascus, Washington is only likely to secure active Iranian and Syrian co-operation by paying a high price diplomatically from two countries known for their hard bargaining.

IRANIAN WISHES

Iran wants a wholesale transformation of is relationship with the United States, which is one of the most antagonistic in the world.

At the moment attention of the US and its allies is on Iran's nuclear programme which they say is intended to produce a non-conventional military capability.

Iran wants to be allowed to continue its programme - including uranium enrichment - which it says is completely peaceful as well as its right under the international non-proliferation regime.

That means an end to the threat of UN sanctions - which Tehran has been able to avoid so far - and an end to US and Israeli threats of military action to destroy its nuclear facilities.

In the past, Tehran has had its fingers burnt by trying to open a dialogue with this most hawkish of US administrations.

In May 2003, for example, it offered to open up its nuclear programme, rein in Hezbollah and co-operate against al-Qaeda, but was reportedly rebuffed as the insistence of former Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Vice-President Dick Cheney.

Since then, a right-wing Iranian president has been elected, although overall executive power lies with the religious revolutionary leadership of Ayatollah Khamenei.

From its past experience, Iran is likely to reject any overtures from the US or its allies for talks on limited issues.

It wants to be absolved completely from Washington's designation of it as part of the "axis of evil" - a state to be shunned by Western allies.

It is not clear how much of a greater role it wants to be given in Iraq.

It already enjoys a close relationship with the government dominated by religious Shia Muslims, but a greater role may cause greater friction with the Sunni Muslim community.

SYRIAN WISHES

The regime in Damascus finds itself on much shakier ground than its Iranian ally at the moment.

It is under great pressure over the investigation into the murder of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri.

So far a UN-backed tribunal has implicated Syria in the bombing that killed Mr Hariri in February 2005, but Damascus denies involvement.

It may hope that its current diplomatic isolation over Lebanon may be relieved if if can play a more positive role in Iraq.

Damascus is condemned as a "state sponsor of terrorism" by Washington because it hosts Palestinian militant groups sworn to Israel's destruction.

It may see this as an opportunity to change that designation - perhaps in a wider effort to solve the Israeli-Arab conflict, including a chance to reopen its own negotiations with Israel on the return of the Golan Heights occupied by Israel since the 1967 war.

Finally, Damascus needs commercial co-operation and support with the West as its political isolation is made worse by a chronic weakness in the country's economy.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/6144842.stm

Published: 2006/11/13 18:31:53 GMT

© BBC MMVI
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
https://vuesdumonde.forumactif.com/
Partager cet article sur : reddit

Iraq: What Iran and Syria want :: Commentaires

mihou
Views from Iran, Syria and Iraq
Message Mer 15 Nov - 10:58 par mihou
Views from Iran, Syria and Iraq
An Iraqi, a Syrian and an Iranian give their views on suggestions that Iran and Syria could be invited by the US-led coalition to play a bigger role in stabilising Iraq.

NASIH OTHMAN, DOCTOR, SULEIMANIYA, IRAQI KURDISTAN

I think the regional powers are really part of the problem in Iraq.

The regimes of Iran and Syria are quite different to what the Americans want for the region.

These regimes have interests in Iraq and in manipulating the situation to their advantage. This is not necessarily in the interests of the Iraqi people.

Both Iran and Syria have common ground in wanting a turbulent Iraq. Both countries are under huge pressure: Iran for its nuclear ambitions and Syria for its role in Lebanon. So a problem in Iraq means the heat is off them.

Involving these two countries in Iraq's future might be one way forward, but only in consultation with the Iraqi government and people. Not unilaterally.

And more importantly, in consultation with the different ethnic groups in Iraq. I am Kurdish. I think the Kurds would be sceptical about such moves. They will fear being abandoned by the West again.

Wouldn't engagement with Iran and Syria be a sort of reward to Ahmadinejad and Assad? The leaders' allies in Iraq and their roles in their own country would be strengthened. It's a very tricky issue.

I'm not sure these countries would favour democracy in Iraq.

It all depends on how much the West will yield to the ambitions of these countries. And how much it is prepared to distance itself from its original objective of setting up a democracy in Iraq.

MARWAN KABALAN, 35, UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR, DAMASCUS

I don't see this as good or bad. I see it as the only available option for the US if they really want to help Iraq.

They have to get the neighbours into the political process. The Bush administration has been trying all other options over the last three or four years. This is the only untried option.

The US has been trying to isolate Syria - hoping this would change its behaviour, perhaps even lead to the collapse of the regime.

The Syrian government is very threatened by the presence of US troops in the region

This hasn't happened. Syria, especially after the Hezbollah-Israel conflict in July, has demonstrated once again it is a key player.

Syria could benefit a lot from being engaged in the talks. It would break its isolation and it might be able to resume the peace process with Israel. Syria wants the Golan Heights back.

So the talks with the US would strengthen the regime.

Syria would benefit from the containment of the wave of extremism which has grown since the invasion of Iraq.

It's in Syria's interests for the US to withdraw from Iraq. Had the American forces succeeded in stabilising Iraq, Syria would have been next for regime change.

The Syrian government is very threatened by the presence of US forces in the region.

But the Americans are still presenting the same preconditions for talks to take place.

Syria needs something in return for complying with these conditions. Syria is saying - we are not a charity, after all!

SAEED LEYLAZ, 44, JOURNALIST, TEHRAN

The main foreign policy issue for the Islamic Republic of Iran is not Iraq, but the security of the Iranian regime and of the country.

If the United States gave Iran security guarantees, the role and function of Iran in Iraq would change.

Of course we have some interests in Iraq. But usually the role of Iraq is greatly exaggerated.

I don't believe the majority of people in Iraq wants to follow us in having a religious government.

And I don't think Iran wants this either. If you establish a religious government in Iraq, the question arises: which country is the leader?

The Shia clerics in Iraq are a big threat for the clerics in Iran.

At the moment [the Iranian city of] Qom is the centre of clerics in the Shia world. The city has taken nearly 30 years to achieve this position, and the clerics don't want it to change.

I think the main source of violence in Iraq is from the Baathists, who are reacting against their loss of power. I believe Baath party people are trying to use religion as a shield.

Frankly, I don't believe Iran has any actual role in the increasing violence in Iraq.

But the US frequently repeat that they want to destroy the Iranian regime. They seem to be saying: "Please wait until we've finished in Iraq, then we'll come and destroy you."

Iran is too isolated in the world. That is why it is following its nuclear programme at such speed, because it has no strategic partner.

If Iran receives good security guarantees, it will be ready to talk about peace in the Middle East - about Iraq, and about suspending its enrichment of uranium.

But neither side trusts each other. Somehow this circle of mistrust must be broken.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/middle_east/6147314.stm

Published: 2006/11/15 13:13:13 GMT

© BBC MMVI
 

Iraq: What Iran and Syria want

Revenir en haut 

Page 1 sur 1

 Sujets similaires

-
» Voices from Iran and Syria
» Chavez supports Syria against US
» Hezbollah's helping hands in Syria
» Mistakes made in Iraq, says Straw
» US echoes Iraq civil war warning

Permission de ce forum:Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE :: MONDE-GEOPOLITIQUE/WORLD-GEOPOLITICS :: PROCHE-ORIENT ET MOYEN-ORIENT/MIDDLE EAST-
Sauter vers: