MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE
Vous souhaitez réagir à ce message ? Créez un compte en quelques clics ou connectez-vous pour continuer.
MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE

Vues Du Monde : ce Forum MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE est lieu d'échange, d'apprentissage et d'ouverture sur le monde.IL EXISTE MILLE MANIÈRES DE MENTIR, MAIS UNE SEULE DE DIRE LA VÉRITÉ.
 
AccueilAccueil  PortailPortail  GalerieGalerie  RechercherRechercher  Dernières imagesDernières images  S'enregistrerS'enregistrer  Connexion  
Derniers sujets
Marque-page social
Marque-page social reddit      

Conservez et partagez l'adresse de MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE sur votre site de social bookmarking
QUOI DE NEUF SUR NOTRE PLANETE
LA FRANCE NON RECONNAISSANTE
Ephémerides
Le Deal du moment : -17%
SSD interne Crucial SSD P3 1To NVME à ...
Voir le deal
49.99 €

 

 Immigrant Bashing For Colonial Control

Aller en bas 
AuteurMessage
mihou
Rang: Administrateur
mihou


Nombre de messages : 8092
Localisation : Washington D.C.
Date d'inscription : 28/05/2005

Immigrant Bashing For Colonial Control Empty
16062006
MessageImmigrant Bashing For Colonial Control

Immigrant Bashing For Colonial Control
by Manuel Garcia, Jr.
www.dissidentvoice.org
June 6, 2006

Do recent immigrants from Latin America diminish the economic advancement of other Americans, in particular black

Americans?


“The reaction to foreign immigrants, as also to internal migration, comes partly from the belief or, in any case, the assertion

that the newcomers are taking jobs that properly belong to established workers already in residence. That many of the

immigrants, if not most, take employment for which the resident workers are not available or that they no longer seek goes

unmentioned. A further, much cultivated negative reaction is ethnic and social -- the newly arrived are thought to bring a

different and presumptively defective racial, religious, familial, hygienic or civic culture to the established community.”

--John Kenneth Galbraith, The Good Society, 1996

A very clear statement of this argument is given by Brother Pruitt, Chairman of the Committee for African-American

Reparations, in Los Angeles, California, reproduced here in full:


On Wednesday, May 31, 2006, "Bro. Pruitt" <AfrikaSpirit@aol.com> wrote:

Greetings,



African-Americans have been injured, excluded and held back since coming to America, so now they have greater

expectations and desires to achieve equality than ever before. Groups who have not been in this country as long as blacks or

have not contributed to the growth of this nation as blacks have are given access to certain rights and privileges that

guarantee them entry into institutions and services that enable persons and groups to progress and become equal. It is a

crying shame to see the descendants of slaves denied entry and find themselves left out of sharing in this vast structure and

fortune that came about from profits of slavery, which materialized in the foundation and infrastructure of this nation. The

Civil Rights Movement was based on a struggle for blacks to overcome constraints and obstacles in society that prevented

them from reaching equality.



Though blacks have made marginal progress since that era, they are now losing ground they gained. African-American

workers, educators and students should not feel uncomfortable when their peers speak Spanish. If Spanish-speaking people

want to come to America they should speak English, just as other minority groups do. African-Americans should not sit by and

watch their brethren in certain fields be forced to learn Spanish because Spanish-speaking people are not forced to learn

Swahili. That is a true encroachment on the rights of black people, and as a proud black man it pisses me off to know this is

exactly what is happening. Those in politics have got to stop this madness and make those Spanish-speaking people know that

it is their responsibility to pull themselves up by the bootstraps and learn to speak English if they want to stay in America,

and learn to respect what blacks, whites and others have come to accept as a melting pot. This means that there is nothing

wrong with being proud of your heritage, but you must learn the ways that people of this country have become accustomed

to, to keep the social fabric of this nation intact.



When Spanish-speaking people began this mass migration into Los Angeles thirty years ago, they were just as nice and

cooperative as they could be. They went out of their way to learn how blacks made it in a society where they are the

underclassmen and underachievers ... they learned the skills and trades of blacks, and they copied them in social activities.

Now that Spanish-speaking people have numbers, they are using race-based tactics to give those who speak Spanish

advantages over others, and they are applying these unfair means to overload the system in competition for programs and

services. They have become very disrespectful in the communities, schools, and prisons, and they are a threat to blacks in

terms of employment, housing, health care, safety, business and education because they are trying to get citizenship for 12

million illegal aliens.



It does not matter what anyone says ... the statistics are there. Spanish-speaking people are receiving free health care that

has been denied to blacks for generations, and they have invaded communities, jobs, schools and public programs that have

historical significance in housing and helping blacks. If the government does not want to provide enough resources to meet

the needs of both groups, blacks had better come together and demand Reparations to ensure their piece of the pie, because

the climate in America is leaning towards the 'new Negroes'.



African-Americans should look at this immigration issue in terms of others getting resources and concessions that they should

have received long ago. Blacks have never been compensated for unpaid slave labor, psychological abuse caused by suffering

from displacement, lynchings and segregation, and the powers that be broke promises that were given to them in social,

political and legal actions to assist them in life after slavery. Blacks should demand the immediate production of an

African-American Reparations Package that will guarantee them land, resources and technology to meet the needs of their

people to improve Integration, establish Repatriation and secure Separation. If we blacks do not stand up to fight for what

is rightfully ours, we will recede to a lower status in image and standing in this nation, and around the world.



I know this is heavy information, but if you read my home page thoroughly, you will understand this position for

African-Americans: http://hometown.aol.com/blk2day/myhomepage/index.html.



In loving memory of our ancestors, Bro. Pruitt, Chairman, Committee for African-American Reparations (CAAR) 6614 South

Western Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90047



[letter of 31 May 2006, distributed by John Wilmerding, CERJ@igc.org]




I do not think it is possible to change the type of thinking expressed by Brother Pruitt; it represents a justifiable frustration

within a limited conceptual framework.

In framing a response I will use the word "native". If this makes you cringe, good, I want you to think about why this is so.

Colonial administration always relies on creating dissension between subjugated "native" tribes and populations. The

fundamental white-power core of the American ruling class manages the nation in the colonial style. It sees itself as a small

elite of elevated race (with a sprinkling of approved and tested tokens) that must control a vast, lower-class population.

Setting the natives against each other in petty jealousies helps to fragment any opposition to their true masters.

The "carrot" always offered to subjugated natives is the chance to "sit at the right hand of the master, at his table." This is

an avenue of advancement for a select few -- the Clarence Thomases, the Alberto Gonzalezes -- to implement the rule of the

elite to the detriment of their own tribes, but for personal gain. Such people have been termed the "comprador" class in the

literature of colonial administration. These are the "native bosses" who buy the labor needed for elite projects (e.g., native

troops and native police), and keep current on doings in the tribes, to ensure the elite can quell independent thinking should

it threaten to arise (e.g., weed out opposition leaders). They also man the facade of "diversity" and "equal opportunity"

which all colonial administrations find useful for public relations. See the movie "Burn" by Pontecorvo (1970, starring Marlon

Brando).

What can frustrate many natives is that the comprador option is just a cynical ploy, not an indication of real avenues of

opportunity. So it is only open to a few, and these must be both highly capable and thoroughly compromised. Thus there can

be much frustration among natives who are taken in by the ploy yet unable to actualize the false promises. Many want to "sit

at the table" and believe themselves worthy, either on the basis of their own talents and achievements or by association with

a reliably exploitable tribe ("we deserve it").

Some, like Malcolm X, come to realize that there will NEVER be a time when their kind will be welcomed "at the table." I

could say "at the table of the (Great White) Father" to add the religious connection generally implied by the hierarchical

concept enshrined in Judeo-Christian religions; this concept is melded to a racial hierarchical concept. Mark Twain was one clear voice about this racist reality of American religious conceptions. But, I digress.
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
https://vuesdumonde.forumactif.com/
Partager cet article sur : reddit

Immigrant Bashing For Colonial Control :: Commentaires

mihou
Re: Immigrant Bashing For Colonial Control
Message Ven 16 Juin - 0:34 par mihou
When you argue with others about whose suffering under oppression is worse, then you play the oppressor's game. When you

make common cause with others who are oppressed, then you build power against oppression. Let me give some examples.

Between the War of 1812 and the presidency of Andrew Jackson, ethnic cleansing of the American Indian tribes was

prosecuted in the American South east of the Mississippi River. Survivors and escapees from this, for example the Cherokee

Trail of Tears to Oklahoma, hid out in Florida, still officially Spanish territory, and an undeveloped wilderness of swamps

and wetlands. This became a destination for runaway slaves, whom the Indians took in. From the relations of these diverse

oppressed populations arose the Seminole Indian tribe, and they fought a pair of wars with the United States, defeating

armies headed by Andrew Jackson, among others, who were involved in purely genocidal "search and destroy" missions,

eerily analogous to the Vietnam War a century and a quarter later.

The Seminoles were eventually abandoned to their Everglades hideouts, as the US gained possession of Florida, and

concentrated its development on the high ground further north, and the coast. This development was plantation agriculture

with black slave labor. An expanding economy based on slave labor spread west and penetrated Texas. There were very

prosperous American slave-owners in Texas, having settled on large spreads of land. However, there was a slight problem

with these American Texans, they were in Mexico, not the United States, and there had been an official banning of slavery

in all of the Spanish territory liberated by the Bolivarian revolutions of the 1820s and 1830s. Mexico was a republic with

slavery outlawed. Well, we know the story, Jim Bowie and Daniel Boone and Sam Houston made a gallant effort to defend

their freedom to enslave others, by precipitating a war between the United States and Mexico (1846 for the Alamo, where

the slave-owners died in a battle immortalized by a John Wayne movie; 1848 for the US-Mexico War).

So all those Mexicans killed in the years of war with the "Colossus of the North" over the situation in Texas were fighting

not just for the territorial integrity of Mexico against a US land-grab, but also for an anti-slavery way of life. Mexico lost

dearly. One imagines it could have sold out Texas and keep other lands, or simply carved out a slavery exception in its legal

structure to satisfy the American settlers -- really illegal immigrants seeking special rights (to echo the complaints of today).

But they didn't; perhaps a little respect is deserved them for nobility so ill repaid.

As has been noted, because of this unjust war (Lincoln, Grant, Thoreau, and others were aghast at its illegality and

immorality), that part of Mexico from the Gulf of Mexico near San Antonio, up to the Pacific Ocean near southern Oregon

was taken over by the US. "We didn't move, the border did." Mexico lost much (1/3?) of its arable land (i.e., California

Central Valley). How stomachs work and where crops can grow does not change with the change in political fortunes and

political borders, so it hardly seems strange to see many Mexican workers following the plantings and harvests along the

North American southwest.

One can continue with modern day (20th century and today) examples of appreciation and respect shown African-American

ballplayers and musicians who traveled to Latin America: no segregated travel, no segregated hotels, no segregated pay,

adoring women fans. This despite the fact Latinos are aware of the role of black troops being part of the many and bloody

invasions, interventions and occupations by the US in Latin America. Being aware of their history and of how colonialism and

slavery are implemented, they knew such blacks to be "native troops," an inevitable feature in the coercive force of any

imperial & racist power (I think it impossible for imperialism to be non-racist).

Latin America is the land of coffee and chocolate, they are accustomed to it from coconut white to velvety black. Latin

America is a land of Mestizo people, a blending of American Indian, black and Spanish (see the movie "The Motorcycle

Diaries," 2004). There simply isn't that same hyper-racism that is endemic in the US, and most explicitly expressed in the

North American South up through the 1960s. North American blacks unused to Latin Americans may over-react to them

because they have been over-sensitized by the sheer brutality and rabid virulence of North American white-power Christian

racism.

I have read that, proportionately, black Americans feed more tips turning in illegal aliens than any other officially tracked

US ethnic category. I don't know if this is a bit of disinformation disseminated in the service of colonial control (to stir up

native inter-tribal friction), or if it is an actual fact. If so, I pity the deluded, but I understand the delusion as being a

product of colonial control.

Now, about "English only." First, you must understand that it is impossible to be completely uncomprehending of English and

make a living in the US. EVERY Latin American knows enough English to minimally get work as a day laborer. Many Latin

Americans are bilingual and trilingual, simply because language instruction is broader even in very poor communities as

compared with the US, where it is abysmal. Second, quite a number of Latin Americans are also "Indians" -- real natives -- or

members of communities that were themselves immigrant to Latin America. Also, there is a large exchange of travelers

between Latin America and the rest of the world, often tourism and business from North Americans and Europeans (and

Japanese and Chinese); and there is quite a bit of participation by Latin Americans as "foreign workers" whether at holiday

and resort industries, cruise ships, at overseas locations, as foreign factory workers, and of course US agricultural workers

(95% of kitchen help in US eateries is Latin American, I know a Mexican sushi chef). So Latin Americans will at least speak

Spanish and a local language, or Spanish and pidgin English plus any local language, and possibly Spanish and/or Portuguese

and/or a local language and some English. This minimal English of most Latin Americans is insufficient to pass timed tests,

especially with questions requiring particularly North American white concepts and idioms. However, this minimal English is

always beyond the zero Spanish of the typical "English-only" 'Murcan.

The complaint about "English only" can have several components:

1, I object to people who can learn a second language having an advantage over those who can't (won't?).

2, I object to the expansion of the field of candidates I must compete with, if you allow others to take examinations and/or

fill out official forms and legal requirements in a language other than the one I use.

3, English is already a second language for me, because among my own people I speak in a way that the ruling class in the US

cannot understand, so if I have to speak in this official way to carry on my life in this country then I demand that any

immigrant also be forced to verbalize in this official manner (US English) in any activity in which I also have to use English

(e.g., school, legal documents, public appearances, on the job).

Behind such complaints is the frustration of the marginalized "native," the "I resent newcomers getting ahead of me on line

to sit at master's right hand at the table." This is all to the good of colonial control: "better the natives, both new and old,

are at each other's throats than united in opposition to our command." Divide and conquer.

As I have already said, I think none of this can penetrate a mind confined by limited conceptions to bitter resentment over

the undeniable crime of colonial (racist imperialist) oppression. Unite, that justice may prevail.

“The tendency to see the poorer immigrant as an intruder and in some measure as a burden is something the good society

rejects. It sees the immigrant worker in the full light of the service he or she performs. It is understood and accepted that

life in the advanced countries would be difficult without a steady foreign contribution to what, admittedly, are the lower,

more arduous levels of the labor force. Accordingly, those coming and so serving should be both welcomed and encouraged

and, needless to say, should encounter no discrimination or hostility based on race, color, language or cultural difference.”

--John Kenneth Galbraith, The Good Society, 1996

Manuel Garcia, Jr. is a physicist who studies fluid flow, electricity and energy. He can be reached at: mango@idiom.com.

Visit his website at: www.idiom.com/~garcia.
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/June06/Garcia06.htm
 

Immigrant Bashing For Colonial Control

Revenir en haut 

Page 1 sur 1

 Sujets similaires

-
» Many Blacks Concerned That Legalizing Undocumented Immigrant
» Bolivia gas under state control
» Taking control of your digital ID
» Bolivia takes control of gas sale
» NATURAL RESOURCES AND POPULATION CONTROL

Permission de ce forum:Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE :: SOCIETE-SOCIETY :: IMMIGRATION-EMIGRATION-
Sauter vers: