MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE
Vous souhaitez réagir à ce message ? Créez un compte en quelques clics ou connectez-vous pour continuer.
MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE

Vues Du Monde : ce Forum MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE est lieu d'échange, d'apprentissage et d'ouverture sur le monde.IL EXISTE MILLE MANIÈRES DE MENTIR, MAIS UNE SEULE DE DIRE LA VÉRITÉ.
 
AccueilAccueil  PortailPortail  GalerieGalerie  RechercherRechercher  Dernières imagesDernières images  S'enregistrerS'enregistrer  Connexion  
Derniers sujets
Marque-page social
Marque-page social reddit      

Conservez et partagez l'adresse de MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE sur votre site de social bookmarking
QUOI DE NEUF SUR NOTRE PLANETE
LA FRANCE NON RECONNAISSANTE
Ephémerides
-40%
Le deal à ne pas rater :
Tefal Ingenio Emotion – Batterie de cuisine 10 pièces (induction, ...
59.99 € 99.99 €
Voir le deal

 

 7 Habits of Highly Effective Nutritional Programs

Aller en bas 
AuteurMessage
mihou
Rang: Administrateur
mihou


Nombre de messages : 8092
Localisation : Washington D.C.
Date d'inscription : 28/05/2005

7 Habits of Highly Effective Nutritional Programs Empty
10082007
Message7 Habits of Highly Effective Nutritional Programs

7 Habits of Highly Effective Nutritional Programs
by John M. Berardi

Take a look around the nutrition world. Confusing, isn’t it? Conflicting
advice is everywhere, and you’re stuck in the middle. You wonder
whether anyone out there even knows what they’re talking about, or
whether the experts will ever reach a consensus on anything. You start
to wonder whether you’ll need a degree in nutritional biochemistry
before you can lose that stubborn abdominal fat. So
what’s the deal? Why so much confusion? Why does one expert suggest
that high protein is best for everyone, while another expert suggests
high carb and yet another expert suggests high fat? Besides, what
exactly do high protein, high carb, and high fat really mean? And why
are other experts telling us that food choices should be based on our
"metabolic type," our "blood type," or our "ancestry"? One
expert says to eat like a Neanderthal and another says eat like a
Visigoth, or perhaps a Viking. But while searching for nutritional
Valhalla, most people just get lost and eat like a Modern American—and
end up looking more Sumo than Samurai. These days, we have a cacophony of expertise: lots of confusing noise from the experts drowning out the signal of truth. On
the surface, it appears as if today’s nutrition technology is quite
advanced. After all, we have at our disposal more nutrition information
than ever before. More money is being spent on nutrition research than
in any time in history. Every day, impressive strides are being made in
the field. Dozens of nutrition experts are rising to prominence. Yet
simultaneously we’re witnessing a steadily increasing rate of obesity,
an increase in nutrition-related illness (Diabetes, CVD, and Syndrome
X), and an increase in nutrition-related mortality. Part of
the problem is that much of the information hasn’t reached the people
who need it. Part of the problem is that even when it does reach those
people, they often don’t use it. And certainly, the problem is
multifactorial—there are probably many more reasons than I can list
here.

How much more information do we need? But
the curious thing is that many people try to solve the problem by
seeking out more information. They know it all and still want more. If
there’s one thing of which I am absolutely convinced, it’s that a lack
of good nutrition information isn’t what prevents us from reaching our
goals. We already know everything we need to know. Sometimes the real
problem isn’t too little information but too much. All
the fundamental principles you need to achieve good health and optimal
body composition are out there already, and have been for years.
Unfortunately, with 500 experts for every fundamental principle, and
very little money to be made from repeating other people’s ideas,
experts must continually emphasize the small (and often relatively
unimportant) differences between their diet/eating plans and the
diet/eating plans of all the other experts out there. In
the world of advertising and marketing, this is called
"differentiation." By highlighting the small distinctions and dimming
out the large similarities between their program and all the others,
they’re jostling for your next nutritional dollar. Now, and let me be clear on this, I’m not accusing nutrition experts of quackery. Yes,
some programs are utter crap. Those are generally quite easy to pick
out and don’t merit discussion here. But most experts do know what they are talking about, can
get results, and wholeheartedly believe in what they’re doing. Many of
the differences between them are theoretical and not practical, and on
the fundamentals they generally agree completely.

It’s all good — sorta In
fact, many of the mainstream programs out there, if not most of them,
will work. To what extent they work, and for how long, varies. As long
as a program is internally consistent, follows a few basic nutritional
tenets, and as long as you adhere to it consistently, without
hesitation, and without mixing principles haphazardly taken from other
programs, you’ll get some results. It’s that simple, and that hard (as
you can see, results depend as much on psychology as on biochemistry). But
if you’re like most people, you’ll first survey all the most often
discussed programs before deciding which to follow. And in this
appraisal, you’ll get confused, lost, and then do the inevitable.
That’s right, you’ll revert back to your old, ineffectual nutrition
habits. Instead of parsing out the similarities between
all the successful plans out there, the common principles that affect
positive, long-term change, you get thrown off the trail by the stench
of the steaming piles of detail. The Atkins program works
for all patients under the direct care of the Atkins team—as long as
patients follow it. The Zone program works for all patients under the
direct care of the Sears team —as long as they follow it. The Pritkin
Diet works for all patients under the care of the Pritkin team— as long
as they follow it. Yet, not all three plans are
identical. How then, can they all get impressive improvements in health
and body composition? Well, either each team somehow magically draws
the specific patient subpopulations most in need of their plan
(doubtful) or each system possesses some basic fundamental principles
that are more important than the ratios of protein to carbs to fats.

The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Nutritional Programs Here’s
my take on it. I call these principles, "The 7 Habits of Highly
Effective Nutritional Programs," a shameless and possibly illegal play
on Steven Covey’s book, "The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People."
(Great book, by the way—you should read it sometime.) These
aren’t the newest techniques from the latest cutting-edge plan. Rather,
they are simple, time-tested, no nonsense habits that you need to get
into when designing a good eating program.

1. Eat every 2-3 hours, no matter what. You should eat between 5-8 meals per day.
2. Eat complete (containing all the essential amino acids), lean protein with each meal.
3. Eat fruits and/or vegetables with each food meal.
4. Ensure
that your carbohydrate intake comes from fruits and vegetables.
Exception: workout and post-workout drinks and meals.
5.
Ensure that 25-35% of your energy intake comes from fat, with your fat
intake split equally between saturates (e.g. animal fat),
monounsaturates (e.g., olive oil), and polyunsaturates (e.g. flax oil,
salmon oil).
6. Drink only non-calorie containing beverages, the best choices being water and green tea.
7. Eat mostly whole foods (except workout and post-workout drinks).
So
what about calories, or macronutrient ratios, or any number of other
things that I’ve covered in other articles? The short answer is that if
you aren’t already practicing the above-mentioned habits, and by
practicing them I mean putting them to use over 90% of the time (i.e.,
no more than 4 meals out of an average 42 meals per week violate any of
those rules), everything else is pretty pointless. Moreover,
many people can achieve the health and the body composition they desire
using the 7 habits alone. No kidding! In fact, with some of my clients
I spend the first few months just supervising their adherence to these
7 rules—an effective but costly way to learn them. Of
course, if you have specific needs, or if you’ve reached the 90%
threshold, you may need a bit more individualization beyond the 7
habits. If so, give me a shout at jb@johnberardi.com, or search around on this site. Many
of these little tricks can be found in my many articles published right
here at T-mag. But before looking for them, before assuming you’re
ready for individualization; make sure you’ve truly mastered the 7
habits. Then, while keeping the 7 habits as the consistent foundation,
tweak away.

John Berardi is a PhD
candidate in Exercise and Nutritional Biochemistry at the University of
Western Ontario, Ontario Canada. John is also president of Science
Link, a human performance and nutrition consultation group dedicated to
translating research into results. The Science Link team works
with clients from around the world and from all walks of life
including elite athletes to cardiovascular patients. To find out more
about his products and services, visit him at www.johnberardi.com or email him directly at jb@johnberardi.com.



http://www.t-nation.com/readArticle.do?id=459493
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
https://vuesdumonde.forumactif.com/
Partager cet article sur : reddit

7 Habits of Highly Effective Nutritional Programs :: Commentaires

Aucun commentaire.
 

7 Habits of Highly Effective Nutritional Programs

Revenir en haut 

Page 1 sur 1

Permission de ce forum:Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE :: SANTE-SPORTS/HEALTH :: ALIMENTATION-HYGIENE DE VIE/ PROPER FOOD DIET--
Sauter vers: