MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE
Vous souhaitez réagir à ce message ? Créez un compte en quelques clics ou connectez-vous pour continuer.
MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE

Vues Du Monde : ce Forum MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE est lieu d'échange, d'apprentissage et d'ouverture sur le monde.IL EXISTE MILLE MANIÈRES DE MENTIR, MAIS UNE SEULE DE DIRE LA VÉRITÉ.
 
AccueilAccueil  PortailPortail  GalerieGalerie  RechercherRechercher  Dernières imagesDernières images  S'enregistrerS'enregistrer  Connexion  
Derniers sujets
Marque-page social
Marque-page social reddit      

Conservez et partagez l'adresse de MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE sur votre site de social bookmarking
QUOI DE NEUF SUR NOTRE PLANETE
LA FRANCE NON RECONNAISSANTE
Ephémerides
Le deal à ne pas rater :
Tablette 11″ Xiaomi- Mi Pad 6 global version (coupon + code promo)
224.97 €
Voir le deal

 

 Question of Strength: October by Charles Poliquin

Aller en bas 
AuteurMessage
mihou
Rang: Administrateur
mihou


Nombre de messages : 8092
Localisation : Washington D.C.
Date d'inscription : 28/05/2005

Question of Strength: October by Charles Poliquin Empty
11102008
MessageQuestion of Strength: October by Charles Poliquin

Question of Strength: October
by Charles Poliquin


Lower Carbs for Endurance Athletes?
Q: Coach, your nutritional approach leans toward lower carbs and
lower grains for most of the population. But what about low carbs
for endurance athletes? Don't they need the energy from
carbs?
A: Here's the thing: If these athletes have the genotype —
the genetic constitution — to be endurance athletes, then
they'll naturally be carb-tolerant anyway.
Question of Strength: October by Charles Poliquin Image001


They're not "made" to be power athletes, and that
goes for their nutritional tolerances as well as their physical
structure. Their diet should be 65 to 70 percent carbohydrates. And
remember, only 25 percent of the population is genetically
carb-tolerant.

I've worked with endurance-type athletes in the past
— swimming, biathlon, cross-country skiing — and
it's not uncommon for a cross-country skier to consume as much
as 6,000 calories per day, with 70 percent of those from
carbohydrate. These types of athletes used to not consume enough
protein, but that's mostly a thing of the past among those who
perform well.

You can't take 1970s research and apply it to athletes of
this century. Their training volume wasn't anything like it is
today, when it's not uncommon for some athletes to train three
times per day. Some national teams may have their athletes consume
as much as 10,000 calories per day. Unless they use carbohydrate
liquids, they're never going to make it.

So, carbs for hard-training, genetically inclined endurance
athletes? Sure.


Cross-what?
Q: What do you think of that Crossfit stuff?
A: I have no clue what the hell that is. Is that one of those
systems that's a mish-mash of everything?

Wait, I saw on article on that in Muscle & Fatness.
Looked like a bunch of cachexic fitness-model wannabes searching
for their souls in the weight room.
Question of Strength: October by Charles Poliquin Crossfit


It reminds me of a Hungarian proverb: "If you only have one
ass, you can't sit on two horses." If you try to do everything in your workout, you get nothing.

Another way to look at it is to think of Tim Ferris's
example of wearing your underwear over your pants. It's
different, and maybe even fun for some people, but it's not
very effective.

No athlete has ever gotten good training like that.


When a Workout a Day Isn't Enough
Q: Got any general tips for training two times a day for
hypertrophy?
A: Twice-per-day training is the fastest way to gain strength
and size, if you can afford the time. Typically, you'd do
heavy, or "neural" training in the morning, and more
time-under-tension training in the evening.

Now, these are relative values. For example, an Olympic lifter
may do doubles and singles in the morning and sets of six in the
afternoon. A bodybuilder may do six reps in the morning and 20 at
night. So, you have to decide what's neural for that
lifter.

So, as a rule of thumb, you want to recruit higher-threshold
motor units in the morning, and lower-threshold motor units in the
afternoon. Or, you can do regular training in the morning and
eccentric (negative-only) training at night.


In most cases, the same body part should be trained in both
sessions — heavy in the A.M., lighter in the P.M. One example
would be 4 to 6 reps in the morning, 12 to 15 reps in the
afternoon.

If strength is your main concern, you'd want to do the same
exercises for both sessions. If you're focused on hypertrophy,
you may want to use different variations of the exercises. So,
powerlifters will do back squats twice per day; bodybuilders would
do bench presses in the morning and incline dumbbell presses in the
afternoon.

Also, you must leave four to six hours between workouts. This
time spread is critical. If you use a shorter time spread —
just two to three hours between sessions, say — you'll be too
fatigued.

As for each session's length, you could start with 20
minutes in the morning and 20 more at night. From there, you'd
work up to an hour each session. You have to take about 11 weeks to
get to two full-hour sessions per day.

Two key points: First, for every 10 days of two-a-day training,
you've got to do five days of once-per-day training to give
your body a break. I recommend training for about 40 minutes in the
morning on those days. After five days, you can go back to lifting
twice per day.

Second, without a proper post-workout drink after each session,
it's impossible to recover from this type of training. And
make sure to take BCAA and beta-alanine during each
workout.








The Post-Post-Workout Drink
Q: I've read that many coaches are now recommending two
post-workout drinks: one right after lifting, another an hour or so
after that. What do you think?
A: I tried it four years ago and saw no advantage of a post-post
workout drink. I'd rather go with one post-workout drink, then
have a solid meal an hour later.


Fail: Cryotherapy
Q: What do you think of cryotherapy, that post-workout
ice-massage stuff?
A: The latest research shows it has no effect at all on
post-workout recovery. It does zippo!

The only thing it does is increase cortisol post-workout, which
is a stressor. In my opinion, it delays recovery — as does
anything that increases cortisol — and is actually
counterproductive. And the newest research shows it does nothing
for DOMS (delayed onset muscle soreness). I've just never seen
it work. Waste of time.

A lot of soccer teams in the U.K. invested money in cryo-suits,
basically a suit that literally freezes you. They stopped using
these suits because they actually increased the number of
injuries — $150,000 down the toilet.

Listen, some things may sound good in a couple of initial
studies, but they just don't stand the test of time.
Cryotherapy was a hot topic a few years ago, but today you
don't hear much about it. Why? It just doesn't work.
Question of Strength: October by Charles Poliquin CRYOCUP


On the other side, look at post-workout drinks. I was using them
in 1982, back when many of today's gurus were playing with
their G.I. Joes. These drinks are still around today and people
keep using them. Why? They work.

It's like squatting: always worked, always will. But look
at all the "superior" machines than have come and gone.
Things that work stick around. Cryotherapy didn't stick
around; post-workout drinks did.


The "Best" Rest Interval
Q: I'm confused about proper rest intervals for strength
gains. Some of the strong guys in my gym barely seem to rest;
others take forever between sets. What's the scoop?
A: Both systems are good, but for different reasons. Long rest
intervals allow the nervous system to recover. Short rest intervals
help to increase work capacity.


In physiology, you have two variables when you look at an energy
system: the power of the system, and the capacity of the system.
Power is analogous to your car's drive train. It determines
how fast it goes from 0 to 60. If you rest a lot between sets, you
improve the power of the system.

Capacity is like the gas tank of your car. If I cut my
rest intervals and force myself to repeat efforts without as much
recovery as I want, I'm expanding the size of my gas tank.

Which is better? You should use a blend. In the sport of
weightlifting, with the new rules, you may have to repeat the lift
after only a brief moment. If you don't have that work
capacity, you're up the proverbial creek with no paddles. So
you'll find that the best coaches use a mixture of short and
long rest intervals.


The Best Time of Day to Train
Q: Assuming a person has a choice, is there a best time of day
to weight train?

A: Actually, there are two, based on circadian rhythms: three
hours and 11 hours after you wake up.

However, your body will adjust its cycle to fit your pattern.
For example, if you always wake up at 6 A.M. and train at 7 A.M.,
that doesn't fit the circadian rhythms. But if you're
consistent and you always train at that time, your body will
adjust.

In 1982, I was part of a study group that went to Russia. I
asked a former world-champion Greco-Roman wrester, who was also an
M.D., what one thing Westerners should change about their
training.

He didn't even hesitate: we need to be more methodical, he
told me. Sometimes we train in the morning, sometimes at three in
the afternoon. We need a more established rhythm.

In my experience, having a regular training time is very
important. So for the average guy with a job, he'll see better
results if he picks a training time and sticks with it, instead of
training before work sometimes, at lunch sometimes, or after work
sometimes.

When you screw around with your times, you screw around with
your results.





Split Training: Back with Bi's or Tri's?
Q: With a split training program, what's better: back with
biceps and chest with triceps? Or back with triceps and chest with
biceps? Is the pre-fatigue from training biceps with back a good
thing or a bad thing? The biceps would be "fresh" if you
trained them with chest, right?
A: I like to work chest as the primary mover, then use biceps
work to recover in between sets of chest. This way the biceps are
fresh. So you can do a set of dumbbell bench presses, followed by a
set of curls.

Then, on back day, you can train triceps in between sets of back
work.

I first learned this from a world-champion powerlifter when I
was maybe 18 years old. It worked really well. Over the years
I've found this to be one of the best splits to do.
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
https://vuesdumonde.forumactif.com/
Partager cet article sur : reddit

Question of Strength: October by Charles Poliquin :: Commentaires

Are Lateral Raises for Sissies?
Q: Is the lateral raise for delts an underrated exercise or a
sissy exercise?
A: If there's one area of the deltoids that need
specialized work, it would be the area hit by the lateral raise. So
you should include lateral raises in your program.
Question of Strength: October by Charles Poliquin Lateral%20raises


Arnold performing the cable lateral raise.

Lateral raises are also good for any athlete that plays in a
sport where there's a lot of pushing and shoving, like when
you're on defense in hockey.


#1 Lesson Learned
Q: As a strength coach, what would you say is the best lesson
you've ever learned?
A: Adopt what is useful and reject what is not. It's the
Bruce Lee principal.

In some systems, only one part is effective and good. Those who
follow the system are successful because of the effective part, and
succeed despite the other shit in the system. I've never seen
a perfect training system, but there are always parts that can be
used.

I think Louie Simmons has some great ideas, but I wouldn't
use 100 percent of what he does. The Russians have some great
ideas, but again, I wouldn't use 100 percent of their
ideas.

Think of fighting. Boxing is a great system when it comes to
bobbing and weaving around, but if you get taken to the ground, you
feel like the rookie in the showers at Riker's Island. The
best mixed martial artists were the grapplers who learned how to
strike.


Good coaching and training has become sort of like MMA. The best
coaches are less dogmatic; they learn from many different
systems.


The Best Olympic Athlete, 2008
Q: I really value your opinion on this: Who was the best athlete
at the Olympics this year?
A: There have always been questions about who's the better
of two athletes. Could Muhammad Ali beat Mike Tyson? Was Bo Jackson
a better two-sport athlete than Deion Sanders? Whose
accomplishments in his chosen sport are more significant: Tiger
Woods' or Lance Armstrong's? And, most recently, who was the better
athlete at the Beijing Olympics: Michael Phelps or Usain Bolt?

I'll give you my opinion: Usain Bolt.
Question of Strength: October by Charles Poliquin Usain%20bolt



Bolt's performance in the 100 meters was freakish. First,
consider that Bolt is 6 feet 5 inches tall, which isn't
considered ideal for the 100, as it's often difficult for
someone so tall to accelerate out of the starting blocks.

Considered primarily a 200-meter runner, Bolt had only started
focusing on the 100 13 months before the Olympics. Despite these
obstacles, and the fact he was running into a headwind, he ran a
world-record 9.69, breaking his previous record set in May by 0.03
seconds.

Even more impressive, he was clearly slowing down at the
80-meter mark, extending his arms out to his sides and even
throwing in a chest slap before the finish line. According to track
statisticians who calculate these factors, Bolt was capable of
running 9.60 had he pushed himself to the finish.

Bolt's performance in the 200 meters was equally amazing,
perhaps even more so than in the 100. Michael Johnson set the world
record in the Atlanta Olympics at 19.32 seconds. Prior to this
Olympics, no one else had ever run faster than 19.62 seconds.
Bolt's pre-Olympic personal best was 19.67. A lot of experts
thought Johnson's world record was untouchable.

They were wrong.




This time, pushing himself throughout the entire race, Bolt
crossed the finish line in 19.30 seconds, becoming the first man to
win the sprint double since Carl Lewis did it in 1988, and the only
one ever to set world records in both events at the same
Olympics.

Further, the last person to hold both the 100 and 200 world
records simultaneously was Donald Quarrie, another Jamaican, upon
whom Bolt said he modeled his running style.

Oh, but Bolt wasn't finished with his Olympic experience —
there was still the 4 x 100 relay.

Running the third leg in the relay, Bolt added another gold
medal to his trophy case when his team finished in 37.10 seconds,
breaking the 16-year-old world record by 0.3 seconds. Only three
other individuals — Jesse Owens in 1936, Bobby Joe Morrow in 1956,
and Carl Lewis in 1984 — won gold at the same Olympics in the 100,
200, and 4 x 100. But none of them set world records in the 100 or
200.

Finally, factor in that all of Bolt's races were considered
blowouts. He won the 100 by 0.2 seconds, the 200 by 0.66 seconds,
and the 4 x 100 by 0.96 seconds. The last one was the largest
margin of victory in that event since the 1936 Games. Three gold
medals, three world records, three blowouts, and Bolt made it look
easy!

All right, before I get loads of hate mail from Michael Phelps
"phans" who believe he's the greatest Olympian of
all time, I need to explain my position.
Question of Strength: October by Charles Poliquin Michaelphelps


Phelps' performance is certainly remarkable and unprecedented,
but I contend that Phelps can't qualify as a better athlete
than Bolt.


Here's why: Swimming is still underdeveloped as a sport,
especially when compared to track and field. If track and field
athletes trained under the same methodology as swimming, you could
time people in the 100 meters with a calendar!

Think about it. How is Dara Torres able to perform so well at
41, when she's more than twice as old as some of her
competitors? Because Torres is training smarter than her younger
colleagues! Could a 41-year-old athlete do as well in track? No
way.
Question of Strength: October by Charles Poliquin Dara-torres


Torres has basically applied what's called a "George
Costanza approach" to swimming: She does the opposite of
what's currently done by her competitors. Just look at Torres'
physique, which she obviously built with proper weight training,
and compare it to those of her younger competitors.


She has the strength of a man and the hydrodynamics of a woman
— an ideal combination for a champion swimmer. She's an
innovative athlete. As soon as her competitors follow her lead, she
and other older athletes like her will no longer be
competitive.

Great as Michael Phelps is, I sincerely believe that he
hasn't yet scratched the surface of his true athletic
potential. But he has tremendous spirit, and I wouldn't be
surprised if he competes and wins more gold in 2012.

Further, Phelps' coach, Bob Bowman, was trained by the best,
Paul Bergen. I worked with Paul in training Alison Higson to break
the world record in the breaststroke in 1988. My best advice to
Phelps would be to chat with Torres and see what he can learn from
her.

I'd also advise Phelps to stop eating shit all day. Those
trans-fats he's consuming now are going to take their toll
later on.

Michael Phelps is great, but Usain Bolt is better.



More from the Author
Question of Strength: October by Charles Poliquin Image005


To read more about Charles Poliquin's training methodology and
his strength-coaching certification courses, check out his website.



© 1998 — 2008 Testosterone,
LLC. All Rights Reserved.
 

Question of Strength: October by Charles Poliquin

Revenir en haut 

Page 1 sur 1

 Sujets similaires

-
» Question of Strength by Charles Poliquin
» Question of Strength: Vol 48 by Charles Poliquin
» Question of Strength — January by Charles Poliquin
» Question of Strength: January by Charles Poliquin
» Question of Strength: February by Charles Poliquin

Permission de ce forum:Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GÉNÉRALE :: SANTE-SPORTS/HEALTH :: EXERCICES ET CONDITIONNEMENT PHYSIQUES/EXERCISES AND CONDITIONING-
Sauter vers: