Ce Forum MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GENERALE est lieu d'échange, d'apprentissage et d'ouverture sur le monde.IL EXISTE MILLE MANIERES DE MENTIR, MAIS UNE SEULE DE DIRE LA VERITE.
AccueilAccueil  PortailPortail  GalerieGalerie  FAQFAQ  RechercherRechercher  S'enregistrerS'enregistrer  MembresMembres  GroupesGroupes  Connexion  
Derniers sujets
Marque-page social
Marque-page social digg  Marque-page social delicious  Marque-page social reddit  Marque-page social stumbleupon  Marque-page social slashdot  Marque-page social yahoo  Marque-page social google  Marque-page social blogmarks  Marque-page social live      

Conservez et partagez l'adresse de MONDE-HISTOIRE-CULTURE GENERALE sur votre site de social bookmarking

Partagez | 

 PEERS: List 02092007

Aller en bas 
Rang: Administrateur

Nombre de messages : 8069
Localisation : Washington D.C.
Date d'inscription : 28/05/2005

MessagePEERS: List 02092007

is available online at

Flag Terrorism

"False flag terrorism" occurs when elements within a
government stage a secret operation whereby government forces pretend to
be a targeted enemy while attacking their own forces or people.
The attack is then falsely blamed on the enemy in order to
justify going to war against that enemy. Or as Wikipedia

defines it:
False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments,
corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as
they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from

military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a
country other than one's own. False flag operations are not limited to
war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in
for example, during Italy's strategy of tension.

term comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang
the flag of its enemy before attacking another ship in its own navy.
Because the enemy's flag was hung instead of the flag of the real
country of the attacking ship, it was called a "false flag" attack.

are many examples of false flag attacks through history. For example,
is widely known that the Nazis, in
Operation Himmler, faked attacks on their own people and resources
which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland.
And it has now been persuasively argued — as shown, for
example, in this History Channel video — that Nazis set
to their own parliament, the Reichstag, and blamed that fire on others.
The Reichstag fire was the watershed event which justified
Hitler's seizure of power and suspension of liberties.

in the early 1950s, agents of an Israeli terrorist cell operating in
planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S.
diplomatic facilities, then left behind "evidence" implicating the
as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the
Egyptians to identify the bombers). Israel's Defense Minister was
brought down by the scandal, along with the entire Israeli government.
Click here for verification.

The Russian KGB apparently conducted a wave of bombings in Russia in order to justify war

against Chechnya and put Vladimir Putin into power
(see also this short essay and this report). And the Turkish government has been
caught bombing its own and blaming it on a rebel group in
order to justify a crackdown on that group. Muslim governments also play
this game. For example, the well-respected former Indonesian president
claimed that their government had a role in the Bali bombings.

sounds nuts, right? You've never heard of this "false flag
terrorism," where a government attacks its own people then blames others
in order to justify its goals, right? And you are skeptical
of the statements discussed above? Please take a look
at these historical quotes:

"If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise
fighting a foreign enemy." - U.S. President James

"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is
the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a
fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ...
Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are
being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country." - Hermann
Goering, Nazi leader.

What about the U.S.?

logical to assume that, even if other countries have carried out false
flag operations (especially horrible regimes such as, say, the
Nazis or Stalin), the U.S. has never done so?
Well, as documented by the New York Times, Iranians working for the C.I.A. in the 1950's posed

Communists and staged bombings in Iran in order to turn the country
against its democratically-elected president (see also this


And, as confirmed by a former Italian Prime Minister, an
judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence, NATO,

the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and blamed
communists, in order to rally people’s support for their
governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program
"You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people,
unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite

simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to
turn to the state to ask for greater security."

Moreover, recently declassified U.S. Government documents show that in
the 1960s, the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan
code-named Operation Northwoods to blow up American airplanes (using an
elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to
terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in
order to justify an invasion of Cuba.
The operation was not carried out only because the Kennedy
administration refused to implement these Pentagon plans.

lots more on the astonishing Operation Northwoods, see the ABC
news report; the official declassified documents; and
watch this
interview with James Bamford, the former Washington Investigative
Producer for ABC's World News Tonight with Peter Jennings. One
quote from the Northwoods documents states: "A 'Remember the
incident could be arranged: We could blow up a US ship in Guantanamo
and blame Cuba. Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful
wave of national indignation."

What about Al-Qaeda?

might think Al-Qaeda is different. It is very powerful, organized, and
out to get us, right? Consider this Los Angeles Times article, reviewing a BBC
documentary entitled The
Power of Nightmares, which shows that the threat from Al Qaeda has
been vastly overblown (and see this article on who is behind the hype). And former
National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski
to the Senate that the war on terror is "a mythical historical

you know that the FBI had penetrated the cell which carried out the 1993 World

Trade Center bombing, but had -- at the last minute -- cancelled the plan
to have its FBI infiltrator substitute fake powder for real explosives,
against the infiltrator's strong wishes (summary version is free; full
version is pay-per-view)? See also this TV news report.

you heard that the CIA is alleged to have met with Bin Laden two months before 9/11? Did you
know that years after 9/11 the FBI first stated that it did not have sufficient evidence to prosecute Bin
Laden for 9/11? The agency apparently still does not have any hard
evidence linking Bin Laden to the crime (see also this partial confirmation by the Washington
). And did you see the statement by the CIA commander in
charge of the capture that the U.S. let Bin Laden escape from

you heard that the anthrax attacks -- which were sent along with notes
purportedly written by Islamic terrorists -- used a weaponized anthrax
strain from the top U.S. bioweapons facility? Indeed, top bioweapons experts have stated that the anthrax
attack may have been a CIA test "gone wrong." For more on this, see this
article by a former NSA and naval intelligence officer and this statement by a distinguished law professor and
bioterror expert (and this one).

It is
also interesting that the only Congress-members mailed anthrax letters
were key Democrats, and that the attacks occurred one
week before passage of the freedom-curtailing PATRIOT Act, which seems
to have scared them and the rest of Congress into passing that act
without even reading it. And though it may be a coincidence, White
House staff began taking the anti-anthrax medicine before the
Anthrax attacks occurred.

General William Odom, former director of the National Security Agency, said
"By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the
Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism, yet in
every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in
violation" (the audio is here).

Le Mensonge peut courir un an, la vérité le rattrape en un jour, dit le sage Haoussa
Ma devise:
Revenir en haut Aller en bas
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur

 Sujets similaires

» [INFO] mail2web devient payant !
» [INFO] Support Moto/vélo
» [INFO] HTC Hd2 ou Sony Ericsson X10
» [INFO] [HD] Fix pour My location (mise à jour désormais possible en GPRS)
Partager cet article sur : diggdeliciousredditstumbleuponslashdotyahoogooglelive

PEERS: List 02092007 :: Commentaires

Why Does This Matter?

Please read what the following highly respected people are

Former prominent Republican U.S. Congressman and CIA
official Bob Barr stated that the U.S. is close to becoming a totalitarian society and that the current
administration is using fear to try to ensure that this happens.
Current Republican U.S. Congressman Ron Paul stated that the
government "is determined to have martial law."
He also
said a contrived "Gulf of Tonkin-type incident may occur to gain
popular support for an attack on Iran." Former National Security Adviser
Brzezinski told the Senate that a terrorist act might be carried out in
the U.S. and falsely blamed on Iran to justify war against that

The former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan
administration, Paul Craig Roberts, who is called the "Father of
Reaganomics" and is a former editor and columnist for the Wall
Street Journal
, BusinessWeek, and Scripps Howard News
Service, has said:

"Ask yourself: Would a government that has lied us into two wars
and is working to lie us into an attack on Iran shrink from staging
'terrorist' attacks in order to remove opposition to its agenda? ... If
the Bush administration wants to continue its wars in the Middle East
and to entrench the 'unitary executive' at home, it will have to
some false flag operations that will both frighten and anger the
people and make them accept Bush's declaration of 'national emergency'
and the return of the draft. Alternatively, the administration could
simply allow any real terrorist plot to proceed without hindrance."

(see also this even stronger statement).

Retired 27-year CIA analyst Ray McGovern, who prepared and
presented Presidential Daily Briefings and served as a high-level
analyst for several presidents, stated that if there was another major attack in the U.S., it would lead to
martial law. He went on to say:

"We have to be careful, if somebody does this kind of
- big violent explosions of some kind - we have to not take the word of
the masters there in Washington that this was some terrorist event
it could well be a provocation allowing them, or seemingly to
allow them to get what they want."

The former CIA analyst would not put it past the government to
"play fast and loose" with terror alerts and warnings and even terrorist
events in order to rally people behind the flag.

General Tommy Franks stated that if another terrorist attack
in the United States "the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor
of a military form of government."
Daniel Ellsberg, the famous Pentagon Papers whistleblower, said
"if there is another terror attack, I believe the president will get what he wants. And what he
wants is a new Patriot Act, one that will make the current Patriot Act
look like the Bill of Rights."

Former UN Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter stated before the Iraq
war started that there were no weapons of mass destruction. He is now
saying that he would not rule out staged government terror by the U.S. government.
And British Parliament Member George Galloway stated that "there is a
very real danger" that the American government will stage a false flag terror
attack in order to justify war against Iran and to gain complete
control domestically.

The abundance of reliable information in this essay
suggests that not only has the U.S. in the past conducted false flag
operations, but there is a possibility that 9/11 involved some element
this deceipt, and a future false flag operation cannot be ruled
Let us spread this news to all who care so that we might
build the critical mass necessary to stop these secret operations and
together for a more caring civil society.

Special Note: This essay is an edited version of
the well researched document available at For a collection
of reliable, verifiable information suggesting that 9/11 may have been a
form of false flag operation, please see the 9/11 Information Center at

Final Note: believes it is important to
balance disturbing cover-up information with inspirational writings
which call us to be all that we can be and to work together for
change. Please visit our Inspiration Center at
for an abundance of uplifting material.

See our archive of
revealing news articles at

Your tax-deductible donations, however large or small, help greatly to
support this important work.
To make a donation by credit card,
check, or money order:

these empowering websites coordinated by the nonprofit PEERS network:
- Every person in the world has a heart
- Reliable, verifiable information on major cover-ups
- Building a Global Community for All
- Strengthening the Web of Love that interconnects us all

Educational websites promoting transformation through information and

PEERS: List 02092007

Revenir en haut 

Page 1 sur 1

Permission de ce forum:Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Sauter vers: